Tax Season Tribune

up arrow

Taxes in space: Will astronauts file state returns?

By W-2 Infinity

(Reporting live from a home office somewhere near the stratosphere.)

It’s the year 2042, and you’ve taken a job on the moon. The commute’s a breeze (no traffic lights in low gravity), your neighbor is a robot named Kevin, and—somehow—the Wi-Fi is better than it ever was on Earth. But just when you're settling into your space routine, Tax Day shows up, and your screen hits you with the dreaded question: “Please select your state of residence.”

As Mars missions inch closer to reality and space travel becomes less science fiction, it’s only a matter of time before tax pros face their most out-there challenge: figuring out where tax nexus ends… and space begins.

Astronauts employed by NASA are still considered federal employees—and yes, they file returns like the rest of us. But what about a SpaceX technician based on the moon? Or someone mining crypto in a Mars colony? If you're not physically in any state, does that mean no state income tax? Or will every state want a slice of that sweet, sweet space income?

California might.

Residency rules can get weird even on Earth. Say you move to Nevada but leave a couple things behind in your old L.A. apartment—like your surfboard and a houseplant that’s barely hanging on. That could still be enough for California to stake a claim. Now try explaining that from orbit: “I haven’t set foot in California since the rocket launch, I promise.”

And what about use tax? If you order snacks from Earth to your lunar pod, is that considered a taxable purchase? Asking for a friend who just wants peanut butter pretzels.

There’s also the matter of carbon credits on rocket fuel. And lunar property taxes? Good news: the moon still doesn’t have zoning laws. Yet.

Until the tax code catches up with space life, we recommend staying grounded—literally. For now, you’re still subject to good old earthly rules, even if you’re filing from low Earth orbit. But the day may come when CPAs have to ask: “Did you spend more than 183 days in the thermosphere?”

And when that day comes… we’ll be ready. With solar-powered calculators.

Soda taxes: Bad fizz-cal policy?

By Kathryn Zdan, EA

Editorial Director

A report from the Tax Foundation suggests that excise taxes on sugary beverages may not be a miracle weight loss solution after all.1 Many countries, including the United States, slap a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages – the thought is that with the price increase, people will consume less of these beverages, improving health. Apparently, people tend to just go find their sugar elsewhere rather than not consuming it at all.

The report studied sugar-sweetened beverage taxes (SSBTs… not to be confused with SSTBs, specified service trades or businesses for the purposes of the §199A deduction) across Europe and generally found that although the SSBTs successfully increased prices and decreased consumption of targeted beverages, the overall impact on public health remains as flat as day-old soda. When consumers face higher soda prices, they simply substitute other high-calorie options.

SSBTs can incentivize manufacturers to reduce sugar content in their products, for example the UK's Soft Drinks Industry Levy has different tax rates for beverages containing 5-8g of sugar per 100ml versus those with 8g+ per 100ml. The thresholds create financial incentives for manufacturers to reformulate products to fall just below tax rate bands.

Besides, the report notes, simply reducing sugar will not (on its own) improve health outcomes. There are other studies that suggest that a broader tax on sugar would be more effective in reducing sugar consumption, but could be complex to implement.

The bottom line is that soda taxes may generate some revenue fizz, but when it comes to public health benefits, they're mostly empty calories.

40,000 people with the same Social Security number

In its March 21, 2025, issue of CalTaxletter, the California Taxpayers Association shared this Tax Trivia factoid explaining how 40,000 people came to have the same Social Security number. Reprinted with permission.

Q: According to the IRS, “The most misused Social Security number of all time was 078-05-1120,” which has been used by approximately 40,000 people since 1938, when it was shown in a promotion by the manufacturer of what type of product?

A: Wallets. The IRS explains: “In 1938, wallet manufacturer the E. H. Ferree company in Lockport, New York, decided to promote its product by showing how a Social Security card would fit into its wallets. A sample card, used for display purposes, was inserted in each wallet. Company Vice President and Treasurer Douglas Patterson thought it would be a clever idea to use the actual SSN of his secretary, Mrs. Hilda Schrader Whitcher. The wallet was sold by Woolworth stores and other department stores all over the country. Even though the card was only half the size of a real card, was printed all in red, and had the word ‘specimen’ written across the face, many purchasers of the wallet adopted the SSN as their own. In the peak year of 1943, 5,755 people were using Hilda’s number. The Social Security Administration acted to eliminate the problem by voiding the number and publicizing that it was incorrect to use it. (Mrs. Whitcher was given a new number.) However, the number continued to be used for many years. In all, over 40,000 people reported this as their SSN. As late as 1977, 12 people were found to still be using the number.”

(CalTax: We’re not convinced that using a half-sized replica demonstrates that a full-sized card would fit in the wallet, but that’s another story.)

A few fun facts about this week’s writers:

Kathryn Zdan, EA

Kathryn Zdan, EA, spends her non-Spidell hours on photography and watching horror films (and then sleeping with the light on). She also enjoys hiking, biking, and watching foreign films.

Kathryn Zdan, EA

Guest author W-2 Infinity is moonlighting as a Tribune contributor but with any luck she will continue to provide readers with fun fare during the 2026 Tax Season Tribune! IRL she provides CPE for CPAs for another brand under the CeriFi umbrella.

Never miss an issue

Did a friend forward this to you? To get on the Tax Season Tribune mailing list, visit caltax.com/spidells-tax-season-tribune/ and submit your e-mail address. Past issues of the Tax Season Tribune can be accessed through the Tribune Archives.