IRS releases 2025 optional standard mileage rates

Beginning January 1, 2025, the standard mileage rates for the use of a car, van, pickup truck, or panel truck will be:

  • 70 cents per mile driven for business use, up three cents from 2024;
  • 21 cents per mile driven for medical purposes, unchanged from 2024;
  • 21 cents per mile for moving purposes for qualified active-duty members of the Armed Forces, unchanged from 2024; and
  • 14 cents per mile driven in service of charitable organizations, unchanged from 2024.
    (IRS Notice 2020-5)

The rates apply to fully electric and hybrid automobiles, as well as gasoline and diesel-powered vehicles.


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and stay on top of late-breaking news. Click here for details.

2024-63: IRS releases 2025 optional standard mileage rates

Beginning January 1, 2025, the standard mileage rates for the use of a car, van, pickup truck, or panel truck will be:

  • 70 cents per mile driven for business use, up three cents from 2024;
  • 21 cents per mile driven for medical purposes, unchanged from 2024;
  • 21 cents per mile for moving purposes for qualified active-duty members of the Armed Forces, unchanged from 2024; and
  • 14 cents per mile driven in service of charitable organizations, unchanged from 2024.
    (IRS Notice 2025-5)

The rates apply to fully electric and hybrid automobiles, as well as gasoline and diesel-powered vehicles.


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and stay on top of late-breaking news. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Congress proposes one-year delay in BOI reporting requirements for most businesses

Tucked away in the proposed 1,500-page continuing resolution (CR) that Congress is hoping to pass this week is a one-year delay in the January 1, 2025, beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting deadline for those entities subject to the BOI reporting mandate that were in existence prior to January 1, 2024. (CR Title V, Subtitle C, §122) It is unclear at this stage whether the CR will pass in its current form.

If this provision is enacted as currently proposed, it would not impact the requirement that entities subject to the mandate that are formed in 2024 file their initial report within 90 days of formation and those entities formed after 2024 file their reports within 30 days of formation. However, the preliminary injunction put in place by the U.S. District Court in East Texas has put these requirements on hold, at least for now. (Texas Top Cop Shop v. Garland (December 3, 2024) U.S. Dist. Ct., Eastern Dist. of Texas, Case No. 4:24-CV-478)

We will send another Flash E-mail with any further developments.

The text of the proposed continuing resolution is available at:

https://go.spidell.com/e/837113/billsthisweek-20241216-CR-pdf/5ywwz8/2361706954/h/NipYP-gAC36lbHc-j29GKOo-YzOsQkWr-0JzCz7kH2Q


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and stay on top of late-breaking news. Click here for details.

2024-62: Congress proposes one-year delay in BOI reporting requirements for most businesses

Tucked away in the proposed 1,500-page continuing resolution (CR) that Congress is hoping to pass this week is a one-year delay in the January 1, 2025, beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting deadline for those entities subject to the BOI reporting mandate that were in existence prior to January 1, 2024. (CR Title V, Subtitle C, §122) It is unclear at this stage whether the CR will pass in its current form.

If this provision is enacted as currently proposed, it would not impact the requirement that entities subject to the mandate that are formed in 2024 file their initial report within 90 days of formation and those entities formed after 2024 file their reports within 30 days of formation. However, the preliminary injunction put in place by the U.S. District Court in East Texas has put these requirements on hold, at least for now. (Texas Top Cop Shop v. Garland (December 3, 2024) U.S. Dist. Ct., Eastern Dist. of Texas, Case No. 4:24-CV-478)

We will send another Flash E-mail with any further developments.

The text of the proposed continuing resolution is available at:

https://go.spidell.com/e/837113/billsthisweek-20241216-CR-pdf/5ywwz8/2361706954/h/NipYP-gAC36lbHc-j29GKOo-YzOsQkWr-0JzCz7kH2Q


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and stay on top of late-breaking news. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Federal Disaster Tax Relief Act enacted

President Biden has signed the Federal Disaster Tax Relief Act (H.R. 5863; P.L. 118-148). As we previously reported, the bill:

  • Retroactively excludes from gross income qualified wildfire relief payments paid to individuals as compensation (other than insurance payments) for losses, expenses, or damages for any wildfire declared a federal disaster after December 31, 2014 (§3, H.R. 5863);
  • Treats disaster relief payments to victims of the East Palestine, Ohio, train derailment as excludable IRC §139(b) payments (§3, H.R. 5863); and
  • Allows individual victims with a net disaster loss from any taxable year to claim an enhanced personal casualty loss under IRC §165(h) for certain federally declared disasters that occurred after February 24, 2021. (§2, H.R. 5863)

We anticipate that the IRS will issue additional guidance shortly, and we will keep you posted as updates become available.


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and stay on top of late-breaking news. Click here for details.

2024-61: Federal Disaster Tax Relief Act enacted

President Biden has signed the Federal Disaster Tax Relief Act (H.R. 5863; P.L. 118-148). As we previously reported, the bill:

  • Retroactively excludes from gross income qualified wildfire relief payments paid to individuals as compensation (other than insurance payments) for losses, expenses, or damages for any wildfire declared a federal disaster after December 31, 2014 (§3, H.R. 5863);
  • Treats disaster relief payments to victims of the East Palestine, Ohio, train derailment as excludable IRC §139(b) payments (§3, H.R. 5863); and
  • Allows individual victims with a net disaster loss from any taxable year to claim an enhanced personal casualty loss under IRC §165(h) for certain federally declared disasters that occurred after February 24, 2021. (§2, H.R. 5863)

We anticipate that the IRS will issue additional guidance shortly, and we will keep you posted as updates become available.


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and stay on top of late-breaking news. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

2024-60: IRS grants partial penalty relief for partnerships

Each transferor and transferee that is a party to a sale or exchange of an interest in a partnership (or portion thereof) involving unrealized receivables and inventory (§751 property) must receive IRS Form 8308, Report of a Sale or Exchange of Certain Partnership Interests, from the partnership by the later of:

  • January 31 of the year following the calendar year in which the transaction occurred; or
  • 30 days after the partnership has received notice of the exchange.

Partnerships that fail to timely furnish Form 8308 to parties involved in the sale are subject to penalties under IRC §6722 for failure to furnish correct payee statements (up to $250 per statement).

Recent changes made to Form 8308 have raised concerns that partnerships may not be able to acquire all information necessary to properly report Form 8308 by January 31, 2025, for transactions occurring in 2024.

Due to these concerns, the IRS has announced that it will not charge penalties under IRC §6722 to partnerships that are required to furnish Form 8308 for transactions occurring in 2024 as long as the partnerships:

  • File Form 8308 with Parts I, II, and III completed by the later of:
    • January 31, 2025; or
    • 30 days after the partnership has received notice of the exchange; and
  • File Form 8308 with Part IV completed by the later of:
    • The due date of the partnership’s 2024 Form 1065 (including extensions); or
    • 30 days after the partnership has received notice of the exchange.
      ​​​​(IRS Notice 2025-2)

Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and stay on top of late-breaking news. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

IRS grants partial penalty relief for partnerships

Each transferor and transferee that is a party to a sale or exchange of an interest in a partnership (or portion thereof) involving unrealized receivables and inventory (§751 property) must receive IRS Form 8308, Report of a Sale or Exchange of Certain Partnership Interests, from the partnership by the later of:

  • January 31 of the year following the calendar year in which the transaction occurred; or
  • 30 days after the partnership has received notice of the exchange.

Partnerships that fail to timely furnish Form 8308 to parties involved in the sale are subject to penalties under IRC §6722 for failure to furnish correct payee statements (up to $250 per statement).

Recent changes made to Form 8308 have raised concerns that partnerships may not be able to acquire all information necessary to properly report Form 8308 by January 31, 2025, for transactions occurring in 2024.

Due to these concerns, the IRS has announced that it will not charge penalties under IRC §6722 to partnerships that are required to furnish Form 8308 for transactions occurring in 2024 as long as the partnerships:

  • File Form 8308 with Parts I, II, and III completed by the later of:
    • January 31, 2025; or
    • 30 days after the partnership has received notice of the exchange; and
  • File Form 8308 with Part IV completed by the later of:
    • The due date of the partnership’s 2024 Form 1065 (including extensions); or
    • 30 days after the partnership has received notice of the exchange.
      ​​​​(IRS Notice 2025-2)

Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and stay on top of late-breaking news. Click here for details.

2024-59: Senate sends disaster relief and wildfire settlement exclusion bill to President

The Senate has passed the Federal Disaster Tax Relief Act of 2023 (H.R. 5863).

If enacted, the bill would:

  • Exclude from gross income qualified wildfire relief payments paid to individuals as compensation (other than insurance payments) for losses, expenses, or damages for any wildfire declared a federal disaster after December 31, 2014 (§3, H.R. 5863);
  • Treat disaster relief payments to victims of the East Palestine, Ohio, train derailment as excludable IRC §139(b) payments (§3, H.R. 5863); and
  • Allow individual victims with a net disaster loss from any taxable year to claim an enhanced personal casualty loss under IRC §165(h) for certain federally declared disasters that occurred after February 24, 2021. (§2, H.R. 5863)

The bill previously passed the House and will now be sent to the President. It is expected that President Biden will sign the bill.

The text of the bill is available at:

www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/5863/text


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and stay on top of late-breaking news. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Senate sends disaster relief and wildfire settlement exclusion bill to President

The Senate has passed the Federal Disaster Tax Relief Act of 2023 (H.R. 5863).

If enacted, the bill would:

  • Exclude from gross income qualified wildfire relief payments paid to individuals as compensation (other than insurance payments) for losses, expenses, or damages for any wildfire declared a federal disaster after December 31, 2014 (§3, H.R. 5863);
  • Treat disaster relief payments to victims of the East Palestine, Ohio, train derailment as excludable IRC §139(b) payments (§3, H.R. 5863); and
  • Allow individual victims with a net disaster loss from any taxable year to claim an enhanced personal casualty loss under IRC §165(h) for certain federally declared disasters that occurred after February 24, 2021. (§2, H.R. 5863)

The bill previously passed the House and will now be sent to the President. It is expected that President Biden will sign the bill.

The text of the bill is available at:

www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/5863/text


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and stay on top of late-breaking news. Click here for details.

2024-58: Court puts BOI reporting on hold for all businesses

A federal district court in Texas issued a nationwide preliminary injunction against enforcing the beneficial ownership reporting requirements mandated by the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). (Texas Top Cop Shop v. Garland (December 3, 2024) U.S. Dist. Ct., Eastern Dist. of Texas, Case No. 4:24-CV-478)

The court ruled that Congress exceeded its authority in enacting the CTA, resulting in an unconstitutional infringement on states’ rights to regulate businesses. The court granted a nationwide injunction prohibiting FinCEN from enforcing the January 1, 2025, reporting deadline for all reporting companies.

The opinion was issued on December 3, 2024, and will likely be appealed. However, for now, businesses do not have to file beneficial ownership information reports with FinCEN.

We will continue to update you as news develops on this issue.

The opinion is available at:

www.caltax.com/files/2024/ttcsvgarland.pdf


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and stay on top of late-breaking news. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Court puts BOI reporting on hold for all businesses

A federal district court in Texas issued a nationwide preliminary injunction against enforcing the beneficial ownership reporting requirements mandated by the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). (Texas Top Cop Shop v. Garland (December 3, 2024) U.S. Dist. Ct., Eastern Dist. Of Texas, Case No. 4:24-CV-478)

The court ruled that Congress exceeded its authority in enacting the CTA, resulting in an unconstitutional infringement on states’ rights to regulate businesses. The court granted a nationwide injunction prohibiting FinCEN from enforcing the January 1, 2025, reporting deadline for all reporting companies.

The opinion was issued on December 3, 2024, and will likely be appealed. However, for now, businesses do not have to file beneficial ownership information reports with FinCEN.

We will continue to update you as news develops on this issue.

The opinion is available at:

www.caltax.com/files/2024/ttcsvgarland.pdf


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and stay on top of late-breaking news. Click here for details.

IRS extends due date for enhanced Research Credit refund claim requirements

The IRS is extending the Research Credit claim transition period through January 10, 2026. (www.irs.gov/newsroom/irs-sets-forth-required-information-for-a-valid-research-credit-claim-for-refund) This means that for refund claims filed on or before January 10, 2026, taxpayers will be given a 45-day period to provide the required information for previously submitted claims.

In October 2021, the IRS initially set forth the additional information that taxpayers are now required to include for a Research Credit refund claim. (Chief Counsel Memorandum 2021401F) Taxpayers were given a transition period, during which taxpayers were given up to 45 days to perfect a previously submitted return. Since that time, the IRS has extended the transition period three times.

Pursuant to CCM 2021401F, as modified in subsequent guidance, taxpayers must provide the following information when claiming a Research Credit refund:

  • Identify all the business components to which the IRC §41 Research Credit claim relates for that year;
  • For each business component, identify all research activities performed; and
  • Provide the total qualified employee wage expenses, total qualified supply expenses, and total qualified contract research expenses for the claim year.

This may be done using Form 6765, Credit for Increasing Research Activities.


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and stay on top of late-breaking news. Click here for details.

2024-57: IRS extends due date for enhanced Research Credit refund claim requirements

The IRS is extending the Research Credit claim transition period through January 10, 2026. (www.irs.gov/newsroom/irs-sets-forth-required-information-for-a-valid-research-credit-claim-for-refund) This means that for refund claims filed on or before January 10, 2026, taxpayers will be given a 45-day period to provide the required information for previously submitted claims.

In October 2021, the IRS initially set forth the additional information that taxpayers are now required to include for a Research Credit refund claim. (Chief Counsel Memorandum 2021401F) Taxpayers were given a transition period, during which taxpayers were given up to 45 days to perfect a previously submitted return. Since that time, the IRS has extended the transition period three times.

Pursuant to CCM 2021401F, as modified in subsequent guidance, taxpayers must provide the following information when claiming a Research Credit refund:

  • Identify all the business components to which the IRC §41 Research Credit claim relates for that year;
  • For each business component, identify all research activities performed; and
  • Provide the total qualified employee wage expenses, total qualified supply expenses, and total qualified contract research expenses for the claim year.

This may be done using Form 6765, Credit for Increasing Research Activities.


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and stay on top of late-breaking news. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

2024-56: IRS announces additional 1099-K filing relief for third-party settlement organizations

The IRS is providing transition relief for third-party settlement organizations (TPSOs), also known as payment apps and online marketplaces (e.g., Venmo, Amazon, etc.), regarding transactions during calendar years 2024 and 2025. (IRS Notice 2024-85) Although the American Rescue Plan Act required that TPSOs file 1099-Ks for all amounts paid to a payee if they exceed $600 in aggregate beginning with the 2022 calendar year, the IRS has previously delayed implementation.

According to the IRS’s latest guidance, TPSOs must file 1099-Ks to report transactions when the amount of total payments for those transactions is more than:

  • $5,000 in 2024;
  • $2,500 in 2025; and
  • $600 in calendar year 2026 and after.

In addition, the IRS will not assert penalties under IRC §6651 or §6656 for a TPSO’s failure to withhold and pay backup withholding tax during the 2024 calendar year.

TPSOs that have performed backup withholding for a payee during calendar year 2024 must file a Form 945 and a Form 1099-K with the IRS and furnish a copy to the payee.

For calendar year 2025 and after, the IRS will assert penalties under §6651 or §6656 for a TPSO’s failure to withhold and pay backup withholding tax.


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and stay on top of late-breaking news. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

IRS announces additional 1099-K filing relief for third-party settlement organizations

The IRS is providing transition relief for third-party settlement organizations (TPSOs), also known as payment apps and online marketplaces (e.g., Venmo, Amazon, etc.), regarding transactions during calendar years 2024 and 2025. (IRS Notice 2024-85) Although the American Rescue Plan Act required that TPSOs file 1099-Ks for all amounts paid to a payee if they exceed $600 in aggregate beginning with the 2022 calendar year, the IRS has previously delayed implementation.

According to the IRS’s latest guidance, TPSOs must file 1099-Ks to report transactions when the amount of total payments for those transactions is more than:

  • $5,000 in 2024;
  • $2,500 in 2025; and
  • $600 in calendar year 2026 and after.

In addition, the IRS will not assert penalties under IRC §6651 or §6656 for a TPSO’s failure to withhold and pay backup withholding tax during the 2024 calendar year.

TPSOs that have performed backup withholding for a payee during calendar year 2024 must file a Form 945 and a Form 1099-K with the IRS and furnish a copy to the payee.

For calendar year 2025 and after, the IRS will assert penalties under §6651 or §6656 for a TPSO’s failure to withhold and pay backup withholding tax.


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and stay on top of late-breaking news. Click here for details.

Deadline extended for third-party payers to file corrected ERC claims

The IRS announced that it is extending the deadline for third-party payers to file corrected ERC claims from November 22, 2024, to December 31, 2024. (e-News for Tax Professionals 2024-47) As we reported previously, this consolidated claim process allows third-party payers who filed ERC claims for multiple clients on a consolidated basis to withdraw the ERC claims for some, but not all, of the prior claims.

Details about who is eligible and how third-party payers can apply are available in our September 26, 2024, Flash E-mail.


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

2024-55: Deadline extended for third-party payers to file corrected ERC claims

The IRS announced that it is extending the deadline for third-party payers to file corrected ERC claims from November 22, 2024, to December 31, 2024. (e-News for Tax Professionals 2024-47) As we reported previously, this consolidated claim process allows third-party payers who filed ERC claims for multiple clients on a consolidated basis to withdraw the ERC claims for some, but not all, of the prior claims.

Details about who is eligible and how third-party payers can apply are available in our September 26, 2024, Flash E-mail.


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

2024-54: California conforms to more disaster postponement relief, including Hurricanes Helene and Milton relief

The FTB has stated that California will conform to additional federal disaster-related postponement relief related to disasters that occurred outside California (see our October 15 Flash E-mail for earlier announced relief). This additional relief includes, but is not limited to, relief provided to victims of Hurricanes Helene and Milton.

For taxpayers filing California returns, California conforms to the postponement relief provided to affected taxpayers related to the disasters listed below.

Taxpayers should write the name of the disaster (for example, “Florida Hurricane Milton relief per FL- 2024-10”) in blue or black ink at the top of their tax return to alert the FTB. If taxpayers are filing electronically, they should follow the software instructions to enter disaster information.

Disaster-Related Postponement Relief
Disaster Relief period begins IRS Notice
Filing and payments postponed to February 3, 2025
Arizona Watch Fire July 10, 2024 IR-2024-268
Illinois severe storms, etc. July 13, 2024 IL-2024-01;
IR-2024-250
Washington wildfires June 22, 2024 IR-2024-256;
WA-2024-09
Filing and payments postponed to May 1, 2025
Alaska flooding August 5, 2024 AK-2024-08;
IR-2024-279
Hurricanes Helene and Milton (IR-2024-266):
Alabama (entire state) September 22, 2024 AL-2024-05
Florida (entire state) August 1, 2024 (when combined with relief provided for Hurricane Debby) FL-2024-10; IR-2024-264
Georgia (entire state) September 24, 2024 GA-2024-08
North Carolina (entire state) September 25, 2024 NC-2024-08
South Carolina (entire state) September 25, 2024 SC-2024-08
Tennessee (Tropical Storm Helene) September 26, 2024 TN-2024-01
Virginia (Post-tropical Cyclone Helene) September 25, 2024 VA-2024-01
Filing and payments postponed to September 30, 2025
State of Israel, West Bank, and Gaza October 7, 2023 IR-2024-252

See the following FTB webpage for additional information:

www.ftb.ca.gov/file/when-to-file/disasters-outside-california.html


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

California conforms to more disaster postponement relief, including Hurricanes Helene and Milton relief

The FTB has stated that California will conform to additional federal disaster-related postponement relief related to disasters that occurred outside California (see our October 15 Flash E-mail for earlier announced relief). This additional relief includes, but is not limited to, relief provided to victims of Hurricanes Helene and Milton.

For taxpayers filing California returns, California conforms to the postponement relief provided to affected taxpayers related to the disasters listed below.

Taxpayers should write the name of the disaster (for example, “Florida Hurricane Milton relief per FL- 2024-10”) in blue or black ink at the top of their tax return to alert the FTB. If taxpayers are filing electronically, they should follow the software instructions to enter disaster information.

Disaster-Related Postponement Relief
Disaster Relief period begins IRS Notice
Filing and payments postponed to February 3, 2025
Arizona Watch Fire July 10, 2024 IR-2024-268
Illinois severe storms, etc. July 13, 2024 IL-2024-01;
IR-2024-250
Washington wildfires June 22, 2024 IR-2024-256;
WA-2024-09
Filing and payments postponed to May 1, 2025
Alaska flooding August 5, 2024 AK-2024-08;
IR-2024-279
Hurricanes Helene and Milton (IR-2024-266):
Alabama (entire state) September 22, 2024 AL-2024-05
Florida (entire state) August 1, 2024 (when combined with relief provided for Hurricane Debby) FL-2024-10; IR-2024-264
Georgia (entire state) September 24, 2024 GA-2024-08
North Carolina (entire state) September 25, 2024 NC-2024-08
South Carolina (entire state) September 25, 2024 SC-2024-08
Tennessee (Tropical Storm Helene) September 26, 2024 TN-2024-01
Virginia (Post-tropical Cyclone Helene) September 25, 2024 VA-2024-01
Filing and payments postponed to September 30, 2025
State of Israel, West Bank, and Gaza October 7, 2023 IR-2024-252

See the following FTB webpage for additional information:

www.ftb.ca.gov/file/when-to-file/disasters-outside-california.html


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

2024-53: IRS releases 2025 tax year inflation-adjusted retirement figures

In IRS Notice 2024-80, the IRS announced the inflation-adjusted retirement figures for 2025. Key adjustments contained in the notice include, but are not limited to:

  • The IRA contribution limit and catch-up contribution limit will remain at $7,000 and $1,000, respectively. Also included in the Notice are the increased income phase-out ranges;
  • The SIMPLE contribution limit for businesses with 25 or more employees is increased from $16,000 to $16,500, while the catch-up contribution amount for most employees age 50 and older remains at $3,500 ($5,250 for employees aged 60, 61, 62, or 63). For businesses with fewer than 26 employees, the contribution limit is $17,600 and the general catch-up contribution limit remains at $3,850;
  • The annual contribution limit for IRC §§401(k), 403(b), 457 governmental plans, and the federal government’s Thrift Savings Plan is increased from $23,000 to $23,500, while the catch-up contribution for most employees 50 and older remains at $7,500. However, employees aged 60, 61, 62, and 63 can make a catch-up contribution of up to $11,250; and
  • The qualified charitable distribution limit is increased from $105,000 to $108,000.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

 

IRS releases 2025 tax year inflation-adjusted retirement figures

In IRS Notice 2024-80, the IRS announced the inflation-adjusted retirement figures for 2025. Key adjustments contained in the notice include, but are not limited to:

  • The IRA contribution limit and catch-up contribution limit will remain at $7,000 and $1,000, respectively. Also included in the Notice are the increased income phase-out ranges;
  • The SIMPLE contribution limit for businesses with 25 or more employees is increased from $16,000 to $16,500, while the catch-up contribution amount for most employees age 50 and older remains at $3,500 ($5,250 for employees aged 60, 61, 62, or 63). For businesses with fewer than 26 employees, the contribution limit is $17,600 and the general catch-up contribution limit remains at $3,850;
  • The annual contribution limit for IRC §§401(k), 403(b), 457 governmental plans, and the federal government’s Thrift Savings Plan is increased from $23,000 to $23,500, while the catch-up contribution for most employees 50 and older remains at $7,500. However, employees aged 60, 61, 62, and 63 can make a catch-up contribution of up to $11,250; and
  • The qualified charitable distribution limit is increased from $105,000 to $108,000.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

2024-52: FTB changing Secure E-mail system, requiring tax professionals to save old e-mails

Effective November 23, 2024, FTB Secure E-mail users will no longer be required to register with the FTB or log in with a password to open an encrypted e-mail. (FTB Tax News, November 2024) Instead, to view a Secure E-mail message from the FTB, users will be told to click on a button to view the e-mail and then will be given the option to either:

  • Re-sign in to their e-mail account; or
  • Sign in with a one-time passcode that will be sent to their e-mail account (the one-time passcode will expire after 15 minutes).

Any existing e-mail messages received from, and replied to, the FTB through FTB Secure E-mail before the November 23, 2024, update will only be retrievable through December 8, 2024. After December 8, 2024, e-mail messages received and sent to the FTB before the update will be purged and will not be retrievable.

Tax professionals should ensure they print out or otherwise memorialize these e-mails prior to December 9, 2024.

Any encrypted e-mail messages received from, and replied to, the FTB on or after the November 23, 2024, update will be subject to a 90-day retention period unless deleted earlier by the user.


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

FTB changing Secure E-mail system, requiring tax professionals to save old e-mails

Effective November 23, 2024, FTB Secure E-mail users will no longer be required to register with the FTB or log in with a password to open an encrypted e-mail. (FTB Tax News, November 2024) Instead, to view a Secure E-mail message from the FTB, users will be told to click on a button to view the e-mail and then will be given the option to either:

  • Re-sign in to their e-mail account; or
  • Sign in with a one-time passcode that will be sent to their e-mail account (the one-time passcode will expire after 15 minutes).

Any existing e-mail messages received from, and replied to, the FTB through FTB Secure E-mail before the November 23, 2024, update will only be retrievable through December 8, 2024. After December 8, 2024, e-mail messages received and sent to the FTB before the update will be purged and will not be retrievable.

Tax professionals should ensure they print out or otherwise memorialize these e-mails prior to December 9, 2024.

Any encrypted e-mail messages received from, and replied to, the FTB on or after the November 23, 2024, update will be subject to a 90-day retention period unless deleted earlier by the user.


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

Beneficial ownership reporting extensions granted to victims of various hurricanes

FinCEN has announced filing postponement relief of up to six months for victims of five recent hurricanes. However, as noted below, the deadlines postponed vary depending on which hurricane is involved. Only victims of Hurricane Milton qualify for relief from the original filing deadline of January 1, 2025, for businesses that formed prior to January 1, 2024.

For all hurricanes listed below, to qualify for the postponement relief the reporting company must have its principal place of business in an area designated both by:

In addition, FinCEN will work with any reporting company whose principal place of business is outside the disaster areas but that must consult records located in the affected areas to meet the deadline. Reporting companies with a principal place of business outside the affected areas and that are seeking assistance in meeting their filing obligations should contact FinCEN at www.fincen.gov/boi.

The six-month postponement relief only applies to reporting companies with an initial or updated BOI filing deadline that falls within the periods listed below based on the hurricane involved:

  • Hurricane Milton: Between October 4, 2024, and January 2, 2025 (see FIN-2024-NTC11);
  • Hurricane Helene: Between September 22, 2024, and December 21, 2024 (see FIN-2024-NTC10);
  • Hurricane Francine: Between September 8, 2024, and December 7, 2024 (see FIN-2024-NTC9);
  • Hurricane Debby: Between July 31, 2024, and October 29, 2024 (see FIN-2024-NTC8); and
  • Hurricane Beryl: Between July 4, 2024, and October 2, 2024 (see FIN-2024-NTC7).

Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

2024-51: Beneficial ownership reporting extensions granted to victims of various hurricanes

FinCEN has announced filing postponement relief of up to six months for victims of five recent hurricanes. However, as noted below, the deadlines postponed vary depending on which hurricane is involved. Only victims of Hurricane Milton qualify for relief from the original filing deadline of January 1, 2025, for businesses that formed prior to January 1, 2024.

For all hurricanes listed below, to qualify for the postponement relief the reporting company must have its principal place of business in an area designated both by:

In addition, FinCEN will work with any reporting company whose principal place of business is outside the disaster areas but that must consult records located in the affected areas to meet the deadline. Reporting companies with a principal place of business outside the affected areas and that are seeking assistance in meeting their filing obligations should contact FinCEN at www.fincen.gov/boi.

The six-month postponement relief only applies to reporting companies with an initial or updated BOI filing deadline that falls within the periods listed below based on the hurricane involved:

  • Hurricane Milton: Between October 4, 2024, and January 2, 2025 (see FIN-2024-NTC11);
  • Hurricane Helene: Between September 22, 2024, and December 21, 2024 (see FIN-2024-NTC10);
  • Hurricane Francine: Between September 8, 2024, and December 7, 2024 (see FIN-2024-NTC9);
  • Hurricane Debby: Between July 31, 2024, and October 29, 2024 (see FIN-2024-NTC8); and
  • Hurricane Beryl: Between July 4, 2024, and October 2, 2024 (see FIN-2024-NTC7).

Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

IRS releases several inflation figures for 2025 tax year

The IRS has released inflation adjustment figures for over 60 tax provisions, including the 2025 tax rate tables. (Rev. Proc. 2024-40) Other key adjustment figures include:

  • Standard deduction: Increased to $30,000 for married filing joint (MFJ); $22,500 HOH, and $15,000 for single and married filing separate taxpayers;
  • Estate tax basic exclusion amount: Increased to $13,990,000;
  • Annual gift tax exclusion: Increased to $19,000;
  • IRC §179 current expense limitations: The dollar limit is increased to $1,250,000 ($31,300 for sports utility vehicles) and the investment limit is increased to $3,130,000;
  • IRC §199A threshold and phase-in range amounts: The threshold is increased to $197,300 ($394,600 MFJ). The phase-in range amount is also increased to $247,300 ($494,600 MFJ); and
  • Excess business loss threshold: The threshold is increased to $313,000 ($626,000 MFJ).

The retirement-related inflation adjustment figures are not included in Rev. Proc. 2024-40. These are announced separately, usually in November.


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

2024-50: IRS releases several inflation figures for 2025 tax year

The IRS has released inflation adjustment figures for over 60 tax provisions, including the 2025 tax rate tables. (Rev. Proc. 2024-40) Other key adjustment figures include:

  • Standard deduction: Increased to $30,000 for married filing joint (MFJ); $22,500 HOH, and $15,000 for single and married filing separate taxpayers;
  • Estate tax basic exclusion amount: Increased to $13,990,000;
  • Annual gift tax exclusion: Increased to $19,000;
  • IRC §179 current expense limitations: The dollar limit is increased to $1,250,000 ($31,300 for sports utility vehicles) and the investment limit is increased to $3,130,000;
  • IRC §199A threshold and phase-in range amounts: The threshold is increased to $197,300 ($394,600 MFJ). The phase-in range amount is also increased to $247,300 ($494,600 MFJ); and
  • Excess business loss threshold: The threshold is increased to $313,000 ($626,000 MFJ).

The retirement-related inflation adjustment figures are not included in Rev. Proc. 2024-40. These are announced separately, usually in November.


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

California conforms to postponement relief related to certain non-California disasters

The FTB has confirmed that California will conform to 29 instances of federal disaster-related postponement relief related to disasters that occurred outside California. However, to date, the California Department of Finance has not determined whether California will conform to relief granted to taxpayers affected by Hurricanes Helene and Milton; the Washington wildfires; the recent storms, tornadoes, and flooding in Illinois; or the September 25, 2025, deadline for the victims of the terrorist attacks in Israel.

As we’ve previously reported, due to legislative changes made by SB 167 (Ch. 24-34), the Department of Finance is now responsible for determining whether, and to what extent, California will conform to federal disaster postponements.

For taxpayers filing California returns, California is conforming to the postponement relief provided to affected taxpayers related to the disasters listed below.

Taxpayers should write the name of the disaster (for example, Iowa storms per IA-2024-04) in blue or black ink at the top of their tax return to alert the FTB. If taxpayers are filing electronically, they should follow the software instructions to enter disaster information.

Disaster-Related Postponement Relief
Disaster Relief period begins IRS Notice
Filing and payments postponed to October 7, 2024
Terrorist attacks in Israel October 7, 2023 IR-2023-188
Filing and payments postponed to October 15, 2024
Iowa storms April 26, 2024 IA-2024-03
Filing and payments postponed to November 1, 2024
Arkansas storms May 24, 2024 AR-2024-01
Florida storms May 10, 2024 FL-2024-06
Iowa storms May 20, 2024, and
June 16, 2024
IA-2024-04; IA-2024-08
Kentucky storms April 2, 2024 IR-2024-159;
KY-2024-02
Mississippi storms April 8, 2024 IRS-2024-176;
MS-2024-11
New Mexico fire and flooding June 17, 2024 NM-2024-05
Oklahoma storms May 19, 2024 OK-2024-02
Texas storms April 26, 2024 TX-2024-13
West Virginia storms April 2, 2024, and April 11, 2024 IR-2024-160; WV-2024-03; WV-2024-04
Filing and payments postponed to February 3, 2025
Hurricane Debby in Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, and Vermont August 1, 2024, for Florida; August 4, 2024, for Georgia; August 5, 2024, for North Carolina, August 8, 2024, for Vermont; August 9, 2024, for Pennsylvania IR-2024-205;
IR-2024-209;
FL-2024-07;
GA-2024-07;
NC-2024-07; PA-2024-02; SC-2024-07; VT-2024-01
Connecticut and New York storms August 18, 2024 IR-2024-234; CT-2024-11; NY-2024-08
Kentucky storms May 21, 2024 KY-2024-03
Minnesota storms June 16, 2024 IR-2024-207; MN-2024-01
Missouri storms May 19, 2024 MO-2024-14
South Dakota storms June 16, 2024 IR-2024-222; SD-2024-13
Texas Hurricane Beryl July 5, 2024 IR-2024-191; TX-2024-08
Tropical Storm Ernesto in Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands August 13, 2024 IR-2024-221; PR-2024-05; IR-2024-226; VI-2024-01
Tropical Storm Francine in Louisiana September 10, 2024 IR-2024-236

Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

2024-49: California conforms to postponement relief related to certain non-California disasters

The FTB has confirmed that California will conform to 29 instances of federal disaster-related postponement relief related to disasters that occurred outside California. However, to date, the California Department of Finance has not determined whether California will conform to relief granted to taxpayers affected by Hurricanes Helene and Milton; the Washington wildfires; the recent storms, tornadoes, and flooding in Illinois; or the September 25, 2025, deadline for the victims of the terrorist attacks in Israel.

As we’ve previously reported, due to legislative changes made by SB 167 (Ch. 24-34), the Department of Finance is now responsible for determining whether, and to what extent, California will conform to federal disaster postponements.

For taxpayers filing California returns, California is conforming to the postponement relief provided to affected taxpayers related to the disasters listed below.

Taxpayers should write the name of the disaster (for example, Iowa storms per IA-2024-04) in blue or black ink at the top of their tax return to alert the FTB. If taxpayers are filing electronically, they should follow the software instructions to enter disaster information.

Disaster-Related Postponement Relief
Disaster Relief period begins IRS Notice
Filing and payments postponed to October 7, 2024
Terrorist attacks in Israel October 7, 2023 IR-2023-188
Filing and payments postponed to October 15, 2024
Iowa storms April 26, 2024 IA-2024-03
Filing and payments postponed to November 1, 2024
Arkansas storms May 24, 2024 AR-2024-01
Florida storms May 10, 2024 FL-2024-06
Iowa storms May 20, 2024, and
June 16, 2024
IA-2024-04; IA-2024-08
Kentucky storms April 2, 2024 IR-2024-159;
KY-2024-02
Mississippi storms April 8, 2024 IR-2024-176;
MS-2024-11
New Mexico fire and flooding June 17, 2024 NM-2024-05
Oklahoma storms May 19, 2024 OK-2024-02
Texas storms April 26, 2024 TX-2024-13
West Virginia storms April 2, 2024, and April 11, 2024 IR-2024-160; WV-2024-03; WV-2024-04
Filing and payments postponed to February 3, 2025
Hurricane Debby in Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, and Vermont August 1, 2024, for Florida; August 4, 2024, for Georgia; August 5, 2024, for North Carolina, August 8, 2024, for Vermont; August 9, 2024, for Pennsylvania IR-2024-205;
IR-2024-209;
FL-2024-07;
GA-2024-07;
NC-2024-07; PA-2024-02; SC-2024-07; VT-2024-01
Connecticut and New York storms August 18, 2024 IR-2024-234; CT-2024-11; NY-2024-08
Kentucky storms May 21, 2024 KY-2024-03
Minnesota storms June 16, 2024 IR-2024-207; MN-2024-01
Missouri storms May 19, 2024 MO-2024-14
South Dakota storms June 16, 2024 IR-2024-222; SD-2024-13
Texas Hurricane Beryl July 5, 2024 IR-2024-191; TX-2024-08
Tropical Storm Ernesto in Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands August 13, 2024 IR-2024-221; PR-2024-05; IR-2024-226; VI-2024-01
Tropical Storm Francine in Louisiana September 10, 2024 IR-2024-236

Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Answers to more beneficial ownership information reporting questions

With the January 1, 2025, beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting deadline looming for those entities formed prior to January 1, 2024, FinCEN has released two dozen more FAQs.

Highlights of the FAQs address the following:

  • Unauthorized practice of law: FinCEN confirms that state law generally governs whether a third-party service provider submitting a BOI report is engaged in the unauthorized practice of law. Spidell is unaware of any state taking the position that submitting a BOI report is the unauthorized practice of law. However, Spidell strongly encourages tax professionals to contact their malpractice insurance carriers to see if this service is included in professional liability coverage (FAQ B.9);
  • Impact of community property laws: Businesses must look to each state’s community property law to determine whether a spouse of an owner with at least a 25% ownership interest in the reporting company is also a beneficial owner (Spidell note: Under California’s community property law, spouses each own an undivided interest in the whole of community property, so if one spouse owns a 25% interest in a company, both spouses are treated as if they own a 25% interest and should be reported as beneficial owners.) (FAQ D.18);
  • Impact of entity conversions: An entity that undergoes a conversion must file a new BOI report if under the state law a conversion results in the creation of a “new” domestic reporting company. A new report is also required if an entity ceases to exist in one state and forms in another state. An updated report, and not a new initial report, must be filed if under state law a new entity is not created because of the conversion, but the entity’s name is changed (e.g. ABC, Corp. to ABC, LLC) (FAQ C.18); and
  • Registration in other state(s): Once an entity files an initial BOI report in the jurisdiction in which it is formed or initially registers, it does not have to file another or updated report if it subsequently registers in another state(s) (FAQ C.19).

The updated FAQs are available at:

https://fincen.gov/boi-faqs

 


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

2024-48: Answers to more beneficial ownership information reporting questions

With the January 1, 2025, beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting deadline looming for those entities formed prior to January 1, 2024, FinCEN has released two dozen more FAQs.

Highlights of the FAQs address the following:

  • Unauthorized practice of law: FinCEN confirms that state law generally governs whether a third-party service provider submitting a BOI report is engaged in the unauthorized practice of law. Spidell is unaware of any state taking the position that submitting a BOI report is the unauthorized practice of law. However, Spidell strongly encourages tax professionals to contact their malpractice insurance carriers to see if this service is included in professional liability coverage (FAQ B.9);
  • Impact of community property laws: Businesses must look to each state’s community property law to determine whether a spouse of an owner with at least a 25% ownership interest in the reporting company is also a beneficial owner (Spidell note: Under California’s community property law, spouses each own an undivided interest in the whole of community property, so if one spouse owns a 25% interest in a company, both spouses are treated as if they own a 25% interest and should be reported as beneficial owners.) (FAQ D.18);
  • Impact of entity conversions: An entity that undergoes a conversion must file a new BOI report if under the state law a conversion results in the creation of a “new” domestic reporting company. A new report is also required if an entity ceases to exist in one state and forms in another state. An updated report, and not a new initial report, must be filed if under state law a new entity is not created because of the conversion, but the entity’s name is changed (e.g. ABC, Corp. to ABC, LLC) (FAQ C.18); and
  • Registration in other state(s): Once an entity files an initial BOI report in the jurisdiction in which it is formed or initially registers, it does not have to file another or updated report if it subsequently registers in another state(s) (FAQ C.19).

The updated FAQs are available at:

https://fincen.gov/boi-faqs

 


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Filing and payment disaster postponements available to taxpayers affected by Hurricane Helene

The IRS is postponing various filing and payment deadlines to May 1, 2025, for affected taxpayers in the following states:

  • Alabama (entire state): For deadlines that occurred beginning on September 22, 2024 (IRS AL-2024-05);
  • Florida (41 counties): For deadlines that occurred beginning on September 23, 2024 (IRS FL-2024-08);
  • Georgia (entire state):  For deadlines that occurred beginning on September 24, 2024 (IRS GA-2024-08;
  • North Carolina (entire state): For deadlines that occurred beginning on September 25, 2024 (IRS NC-2024-08);
  • South Carolina (entire state): For deadlines that occurred beginning on September 25, 2024 (IRS SC-2024-08);
  • Tennessee (8 counties): For deadlines that occurred beginning on September 26, 2024 (IRS TN-2024-01); and
  • Virginia (six counties and one city): For deadlines that occurred beginning on September 25, 2024 (IRS VA-2024-01).

The relief applies to, but is not limited to, the following deadlines:

  • 2023 individual, business, and tax-exempt organization extended 2023 tax year filing deadlines;
  • 2024 individual and business returns and payments normally due during March or April 2025;
  • 2024 quarterly estimated income tax payments normally due on January 15, 2025, and 2025 estimated tax payments normally due on April 15, 2025; and
  • Quarterly payroll and excise tax returns normally due on October 31, 2024, and January 31 and April 30, 2025.

In addition, businesses are also eligible for penalty relief related to payroll and excise tax deposits. This relief varies by state. Taxpayers can find additional information, organized by state, on the IRS Around the Nation webpage.

The IRS notes that many of the areas listed above had previously received relief following Tropical Storm Debby. These taxpayers’ filing and payment deadlines are now extended until May 1, 2025.

The IRS automatically provides filing and penalty relief to any taxpayer with an IRS address of record located in the disaster area. These taxpayers do not need to contact the agency to get this relief. All other taxpayers who are not located in the disaster area but whose records or tax preparer is in the listed area should call the IRS Disaster Hotline at (866) 562-5227 for relief.

We have reached out to the California Franchise Tax Board to determine whether California will conform to this postponement relief for affected taxpayers who have California filing requirements.

The IRS announcement is available at:

www.irs.gov/newsroom/irs-provides-relief-for-helene-various-deadlines-postponed-to-may-1-2025-part-or-all-of-7-states-qualify


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

2024-47: Filing and payment disaster postponements available to taxpayers affected by Hurricane Helene

The IRS is postponing various filing and payment deadlines to May 1, 2025, for affected taxpayers in the following states:

  • Alabama (entire state): For deadlines that occurred beginning on September 22, 2024 (IRS AL-2024-05);
  • Florida (41 counties): For deadlines that occurred beginning on September 23, 2024 (IRS FL-2024-08);
  • Georgia (entire state):  For deadlines that occurred beginning on September 24, 2024 (IRS GA-2024-08;
  • North Carolina (entire state): For deadlines that occurred beginning on September 25, 2024 (IRS NC-2024-08);
  • South Carolina (entire state): For deadlines that occurred beginning on September 25, 2024 (IRS SC-2024-08);
  • Tennessee (8 counties): For deadlines that occurred beginning on September 26, 2024 (IRS TN-2024-01); and
  • Virginia (six counties and one city): For deadlines that occurred beginning on September 25, 2024 (IRS VA-2024-01).

The relief applies to, but is not limited to, the following deadlines:

  • 2023 individual, business, and tax-exempt organization extended 2023 tax year filing deadlines;
  • 2024 individual and business returns and payments normally due during March or April 2025;
  • 2024 quarterly estimated income tax payments normally due on January 15, 2025, and 2025 estimated tax payments normally due on April 15, 2025; and
  • Quarterly payroll and excise tax returns normally due on October 31, 2024, and January 31 and April 30, 2025.

In addition, businesses are also eligible for penalty relief related to payroll and excise tax deposits. This relief varies by state. Taxpayers can find additional information, organized by state, on the IRS Around the Nation webpage.

The IRS notes that many of the areas listed above had previously received relief following Tropical Storm Debby. These taxpayers’ filing and payment deadlines are now extended until May 1, 2025.

The IRS automatically provides filing and penalty relief to any taxpayer with an IRS address of record located in the disaster area. These taxpayers do not need to contact the agency to get this relief. All other taxpayers who are not located in the disaster area but whose records or tax preparer is in the listed area should call the IRS Disaster Hotline at (866) 562-5227 for relief.

We have reached out to the California Franchise Tax Board to determine whether California will conform to this postponement relief for affected taxpayers who have California filing requirements.

The IRS announcement is available at:

www.irs.gov/newsroom/irs-provides-relief-for-helene-various-deadlines-postponed-to-may-1-2025-part-or-all-of-7-states-qualify


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Legislation enacted to provide payroll tax relief to certain loan-out corporations

SB 422, which clarifies the responsibilities of loan-out companies and motion picture payroll services companies for the purposes of remitting unemployment insurance taxes and related obligations, including income tax withholding, was signed by Governor Newsom today.

Under the legislation, the loan-out company, solely for the purpose of remitting employment taxes, is deemed to be the employer of the employee-owners or members who are engaged by the loan-out company to provide services to a motion picture production company or an allied motion picture services company. SB 422 does not alter or modify any other laws with regard to loan-out companies or their employees, meaning that the motion picture company would likely still be treated as the employer for items such as wage and hour laws, etc.

Earlier this year, we reported that the EDD had been auditing and assessing motion picture payroll services companies on the basis that the motion picture companies and not the loan-out corporations were the employers of the loan-out corporation shareholders/employees. After passage of AB 5 and its adoption of the ABC test for purposes of determining whether a worker is an independent contractor or an employee, it has been unclear who is the employer when a motion picture company hires a person to work on a production through a loan-out corporation.

The legislation states that the changes made by SB 422 regarding who is responsible for remitting the employment taxes “is declaratory of, and not a change in, existing law.”

The text of SB 422 is available at:

https://go.spidell.com/e/837113/t-xhtml-bill-id-202320240SB422/5ybq14/2235661320/h/LNOBHXfo3vt_R14tCe5LSBj4EGlHmwDDFKfn34TYqdM


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

2024-46: Legislation enacted to provide payroll tax relief to certain loan-out corporations

SB 422, which clarifies the responsibilities of loan-out companies and motion picture payroll services companies for the purposes of remitting unemployment insurance taxes and related obligations, including income tax withholding, was signed by Governor Newsom today.

Under the legislation, the loan-out company, solely for the purpose of remitting employment taxes, is deemed to be the employer of the employee-owners or members who are engaged by the loan-out company to provide services to a motion picture production company or an allied motion picture services company. SB 422 does not alter or modify any other laws with regard to loan-out companies or their employees, meaning that the motion picture company would likely still be treated as the employer for items such as wage and hour laws, etc.

Earlier this year, we reported that the EDD had been auditing and assessing motion picture payroll services companies on the basis that the motion picture companies and not the loan-out corporations were the employers of the loan-out corporation shareholders/employees. After passage of AB 5 and its adoption of the ABC test for purposes of determining whether a worker is an independent contractor or an employee, it has been unclear who is the employer when a motion picture company hires a person to work on a production through a loan-out corporation.

The legislation states that the changes made by SB 422 regarding who is responsible for remitting the employment taxes “is declaratory of, and not a change in, existing law.”

The text of SB 422 is available at:

https://go.spidell.com/e/837113/t-xhtml-bill-id-202320240SB422/5ybq14/2235661320/h/LNOBHXfo3vt_R14tCe5LSBj4EGlHmwDDFKfn34TYqdM


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Expanded ERC relief for erroneous claims

The IRS has announced a special process available only to third-party payers (TPPs) to resolve incorrect ERC claims. (IR-2024-246)

The new process allows TPPs that filed prior ERC claims with multiple clients to effectively withdraw ERC claims for only some clients while maintaining other ERC claims. One of the hurdles to other ERC relief announced by the IRS was that TPPs that wanted to withdraw claims had to do so for all clients included on a joint filing.

The supplemental claims process is only available for TPPs to which all of the following apply:

  • The TPP has filed one or more ERC claims aggregating credits for itself and/or clients using the TPP’s EIN;
  • The TPP made the claim on an amended payroll tax return; and
  • The IRS has not processed any of the claims the TPP is including in the supplemental claim and is not auditing these claims.

When filed, the supplemental ERC claim replaces an outstanding (and unprocessed) ERC claim. The IRS will treat claims filed before the supplemental claim as if they were never filed. Supplemental claims can only be filed to replace claims filed on or before January 31, 2024.

TPPs who file supplemental claims must file a separate claim for each tax period (payroll quarter) and all supplemental claims must be filed by 11:59 p.m. on November 22, 2024, which is the same due date as the second ERC Voluntary Disclosure Program. TPPs file supplemental claims by filing another amended payroll tax return for the applicable quarter.

TPPs looking for more information about filing supplemental ERC claims should review the IRS’s dedicated webpage on the topic. Go to:

www.irs.gov/coronavirus/filing-a-supplemental-claim-for-the-employee-retention-credit


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

2024-45: Expanded ERC relief for erroneous claims

The IRS has announced a special process available only to third-party payers (TPPs) to resolve incorrect ERC claims. (IR-2024-246)

The new process allows TPPs that filed prior ERC claims with multiple clients to effectively withdraw ERC claims for only some clients while maintaining other ERC claims. One of the hurdles to other ERC relief announced by the IRS was that TPPs that wanted to withdraw claims had to do so for all clients included on a joint filing.

The supplemental claims process is only available for TPPs to which all of the following apply:

  • The TPP has filed one or more ERC claims aggregating credits for itself and/or clients using the TPP’s EIN;
  • The TPP made the claim on an amended payroll tax return; and
  • The IRS has not processed any of the claims the TPP is including in the supplemental claim and is not auditing these claims.

When filed, the supplemental ERC claim replaces an outstanding (and unprocessed) ERC claim. The IRS will treat claims filed before the supplemental claim as if they were never filed. Supplemental claims can only be filed to replace claims filed on or before January 31, 2024.

TPPs who file supplemental claims must file a separate claim for each tax period (payroll quarter) and all supplemental claims must be filed by 11:59 p.m. on November 22, 2024, which is the same due date as the second ERC Voluntary Disclosure Program. TPPs file supplemental claims by filing another amended payroll tax return for the applicable quarter.

TPPs looking for more information about filing supplemental ERC claims should review the IRS’s dedicated webpage on the topic. Go to:

www.irs.gov/coronavirus/filing-a-supplemental-claim-for-the-employee-retention-credit


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Final regulations issued for basis reporting for inherited assets

Final regulations governing the requirement for estates and beneficiaries to consistently report basis were issued on September 17, 2024, by the IRS. (TD 9991)

The most consequential change made by the IRS from the proposed regulations is the elimination of the “zero basis rule” created by the proposed regulations. Under that rule, if the estate failed to report the basis of property that was required to be reported before the statute of limitations expired for assessments, then the unreported property transferred from the estate to the beneficiary was deemed to have a basis of zero.

The elimination of the zero-basis rule is great news for estate beneficiaries. It means those assets will no longer be inherited with zero basis, and instead will follow traditional inherited basis rules.​​​​​​


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024 Trust Webinar Series and get 17 hours of CPE that will help you understand and prepare trust returns. Courses are also available individually. Click here for details.

2024-44: Final regulations issued for basis reporting for inherited assets

Final regulations governing the requirement for estates and beneficiaries to consistently report basis were issued on September 17, 2024, by the IRS. (TD 9991)

The most consequential change made by the IRS from the proposed regulations is the elimination of the “zero basis rule” created by the proposed regulations. Under that rule, if the estate failed to report the basis of property that was required to be reported before the statute of limitations expired for assessments, then the unreported property transferred from the estate to the beneficiary was deemed to have a basis of zero.

The elimination of the zero-basis rule is great news for estate beneficiaries. It means those assets will no longer be inherited with zero basis, and instead will follow traditional inherited basis rules.​​​​​​


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024 Trust Webinar Series and get 17 hours of CPE that will help you understand and prepare trust returns. Courses are also available individually. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Newly released beneficial ownership information reporting FAQs address dissolved entities

FinCEN has released new and updated FAQs regarding the beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirements for entities that dissolve prior to their initial BOI reporting due date. The FAQs clarify:

  • Reporting companies formed after 2023 must file their BOI reports even if they dissolve before their initial filing due date (90 days from date of formation for those entities formed in 2024 and 30 days for entities that form after 2024);
  • These entities must still file their initial report, but there is no reporting requirement to file an additional report to report that the company has ceased to exist; and
  • A foreign company is not required to file a BOI report if it ceased to be registered to do business in the United States before January 1, 2024. However, like domestic entities, a foreign company must file a report if it withdraws its registration at any time after 2023.

The FAQs are available at:

www.fincen.gov/sites/default/files/shared/BOI-FAQs-QA-508C.pdf


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

2024-43: Newly released beneficial ownership information reporting FAQs address dissolved entities

FinCEN has released new and updated FAQs regarding the beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirements for entities that dissolve prior to their initial BOI reporting due date. The FAQs clarify:

  • Reporting companies formed after 2023 must file their BOI reports even if they dissolve before their initial filing due date (90 days from date of formation for those entities formed in 2024 and 30 days for entities that form after 2024);
  • These entities must still file their initial report, but there is no reporting requirement to file an additional report to report that the company has ceased to exist; and
  • A foreign company is not required to file a BOI report if it ceased to be registered to do business in the United States before January 1, 2024. However, like domestic entities, a foreign company must file a report if it withdraws its registration at any time after 2023.

The FAQs are available at:

www.fincen.gov/sites/default/files/shared/BOI-FAQs-QA-508C.pdf


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

 

FTB clarifies filing extensions for SMLLCs

The FTB’s webpage concerning automatic filing extensions for single-member LLCs (SMLLCs) to file their FTB Form 568, LLC Return of Income, has caused some confusion for taxpayers and their tax professionals. (www.ftb.ca.gov/file/when-to-file/due-dates-business.html)

The FTB’s webpage states that SMLLCs owned by passthrough entities receive a six-month extension (e.g., September 15 for calendar-year taxpayers). However, the six-month extension only applies to SMLLCs owned by an S corporation. SMLLCs owned by a partnership receive a seven-month extension (October 15 for calendar year taxpayers).

We have confirmed with the FTB that the webpage does not make this distinction, but the instructions to Form 568 clearly state that the filing extension period for SMLLCs owned by a partnership is seven months and six months for all other SMLLCs.

Bottom line, the filing extension period for SMLLCs to file a Form 568 is based on their ownership as follows:

  • SMLLC owned by an individual (six-month extension): October 15 for a calendar-year filer (R&TC §18567);
  • SMLLC owned by a partnership (seven-month extension): October 15 for a calendar-year filer (R&TC §18567(2)(B));
  • SMLLC owned by an S corporation (six-month extension): September 15, for a calendar-year filer; see FTB Notice 2019-07)
  • SMLLC owned by a C corporation (six-month extension): October 15 for a calendar-year filer. Note: This is different than the seven-month extension for corporations filing Form 100 that was granted by FTB Notice 2019-07. This is because FTB Notice 2019-07 specifically limits the seven-month extension period to Forms 100 and 100W.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

2024-42: FTB clarifies filing extensions for SMLLCs

The FTB’s webpage concerning automatic filing extensions for single-member LLCs (SMLLCs) to file their FTB Form 568, LLC Return of Income, has caused some confusion for taxpayers and their tax professionals. (www.ftb.ca.gov/file/when-to-file/due-dates-business.html)

The FTB’s webpage states that SMLLCs owned by passthrough entities receive a six-month extension (e.g., September 15 for calendar-year taxpayers). However, the six-month extension only applies to SMLLCs owned by an S corporation. SMLLCs owned by a partnership receive a seven-month extension (October 15 for calendar year taxpayers).

We have confirmed with the FTB that the webpage does not make this distinction, but the instructions to Form 568 clearly state that the filing extension period for SMLLCs owned by a partnership is seven months and six months for all other SMLLCs.

Bottom line, the filing extension period for SMLLCs to file a Form 568 is based on their ownership as follows:

  • SMLLC owned by an individual (six-month extension): October 15 for a calendar-year filer (R&TC §18567);
  • SMLLC owned by a partnership (seven-month extension): October 15 for a calendar-year filer (R&TC §18567(2)(B));
  • SMLLC owned by an S corporation (six-month extension): September 15, for a calendar-year filer; see FTB Notice 2019-07)
  • SMLLC owned by a C corporation (six-month extension): October 15 for a calendar-year filer. Note: This is different than the seven-month extension for corporations filing Form 100 that was granted by FTB Notice 2019-07. This is because FTB Notice 2019-07 specifically limits the seven-month extension period to Forms 100 and 100W.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

2024-41: Passthrough entity elective tax “fix” dies in the California Assembly

On Thursday, August 15, 2024, the Assembly Appropriations Committee voted to hold SB 1501 “under submission.” According to our sources at the Capitol, this means that the bill is essentially dead, although it won’t be “officially” dead until August 31, 2024, when the legislative session ends.

This means that the hoped-for fix to the June 15 passthrough entity elective tax prepayment requirement will not happen for the 2024 tax year. Therefore, if a taxpayer failed to pay the greater of $1,000 or 50% of the amount of passthrough entity tax due for the prior year by June 15 of the current tax year, it will be ineligible to qualify to make the election for the tax year.

The FTB does not have the authority to allow for any exceptions to this prepayment requirement.


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Passthrough entity elective tax “fix” dies in the California Assembly

On Thursday, August 15, 2024, the Assembly Appropriations Committee voted to hold SB 1501 “under submission.” According to our sources at the Capitol, this means that the bill is essentially dead, although it won’t be “officially” dead until August 31, 2024, when the legislative session ends.

This means that the hoped-for fix to the June 15 passthrough entity elective tax prepayment requirement will not happen for the 2024 tax year. Therefore, if a taxpayer failed to pay the greater of $1,000 or 50% of the amount of passthrough entity tax due for the prior year by June 15 of the current tax year, it will be ineligible to qualify to make the election for the tax year.

The FTB does not have the authority to allow for any exceptions to this prepayment requirement.


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

2024-40: IRS announces second ERC Voluntary Disclosure Program

Today, the IRS announced a second Employee Retention Credit (ERC) Voluntary Disclosure Program (VDP). (IRS Announcement 2024-30) Notable aspects of this second ERC VDP are:

  • The second ERC VDP is only available for ERC claims filed for tax periods in 2021 and for which the taxpayer received an ERC refund prior to August 15, 2024;
  • Where the first ERC VDP allowed taxpayers to repay only 80% of their erroneously received ERC refunds, this second ERC VDP requires taxpayers to repay 85% of their erroneously received ERC refunds;
  • Applications must be filed using IRS Form 15434, Application for Employee Retention Credit Voluntary Disclosure Program, on or before 11:59 p.m. local time on November 22, 2024; and
  • Applications and any required attachments must be submitted using the IRS’s Document Upload Tool at irs.gov/dut.

Other details of the second ERC VDP are similar to the first ERC VDP, such as:

  • Taxpayers must apply prior to being audited or otherwise investigated by the IRS for the ERC claimed;
  • If a taxpayer used a third-party payer (e.g., a PEO) to apply for the credit, the third-party payer must submit the application for the VDP;
  • Relief from civil, but not criminal, penalties for program participants;
  • The requirement to execute a closing agreement; and
  • The requirement to provide preparer/advisor information for those who helped prepare the taxpayer’s original ERC claim, among others.

Sign up for Spidell’s Quarterly Tax Update for more analysis of the ERC VDP. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

IRS announces second ERC Voluntary Disclosure Program

Today, the IRS announced a second Employee Retention Credit (ERC) Voluntary Disclosure Program (VDP). (IRS Announcement 2024-30) Notable aspects of this second ERC VDP are:

  • The second ERC VDP is only available for ERC claims filed for tax periods in 2021 and for which the taxpayer received an ERC refund prior to August 15, 2024;
  • Where the first ERC VDP allowed taxpayers to repay only 80% of their erroneously received ERC refunds, this second ERC VDP requires taxpayers to repay 85% of their erroneously received ERC refunds;
  • Applications must be filed using IRS Form 15434, Application for Employee Retention Credit Voluntary Disclosure Program, on or before 11:59 p.m. local time on November 22, 2024; and
  • Applications and any required attachments must be submitted using the IRS’s Document Upload Tool at irs.gov/dut.

Other details of the second ERC VDP are similar to the first ERC VDP, such as:

  • Taxpayers must apply prior to being audited or otherwise investigated by the IRS for the ERC claimed;
  • If a taxpayer used a third-party payer (e.g., a PEO) to apply for the credit, the third-party payer must submit the application for the VDP;
  • Relief from civil, but not criminal, penalties for program participants;
  • The requirement to execute a closing agreement; and
  • The requirement to provide preparer/advisor information for those who helped prepare the taxpayer’s original ERC claim, among others.

Sign up for Spidell’s Quarterly Tax Update for more analysis of the ERC VDP. Click here for details.

IRS releases new written information security plan template

A new written information security plan (WISP) template has been issued by the IRS to help protect tax professionals, especially smaller practices, against continuing threats from identify thieves and data breaches. (IR-2024-208) Federal law requires that tax professionals have a WISP and they must affirmatively declare that they have one when they renew their PTIN each year. This new template can be used by tax professionals to meet this mandate.

The new version of the WISP includes several new information updates since the first version came out, including best practices for implementing multi-factor authentication for any individual accessing any information system.

The updated WISP, which is contained in IRS Publication 5708, Creating a Written Information Security Plan for your Tax & Accounting Practice, is available at:

www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p5708.pdf

The IRS also reminds tax professionals that they must report a security event affecting 500 or more people to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) as soon as possible, but no later than 30 days from the date of discovery. This is in addition to reporting the incident to an IRS stakeholder liaison and state tax authorities. Stakeholder Liaison contact information is available at:

www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/stakeholder-liaison-local-contacts


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

2024-39: IRS releases new written information security plan template

A new written information security plan (WISP) template has been issued by the IRS to help protect tax professionals, especially smaller practices, against continuing threats from identity thieves and data breaches. (IR-2024-208) Federal law requires that tax professionals have a WISP and they must affirmatively declare that they have one when they renew their PTIN each year. This new template can be used by tax professionals to meet this mandate.

The new version of the WISP includes several new information updates since the first version came out, including best practices for implementing multi-factor authentication for any individual accessing any information system.

The updated WISP, which is contained in IRS Publication 5708, Creating a Written Information Security Plan for your Tax & Accounting Practice, is available at:

www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p5708.pdf

The IRS also reminds tax professionals that they must report a security event affecting 500 or more people to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) as soon as possible, but no later than 30 days from the date of discovery. This is in addition to reporting the incident to an IRS stakeholder liaison and state tax authorities. Stakeholder Liaison contact information is available at:

www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/stakeholder-liaison-local-contacts


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

2024-38: IRS is processing more Employee Retention Credit claims

The IRS has announced that it will begin processing Employee Retention Credit (ERC) claims submitted prior to February 1, 2024. (IR-2024-203) Previously, the IRS had placed a moratorium on processing any claims submitted after September 13, 2023.

The IRS has also stated that:

  • They will prioritize moving the outstanding “low-risk” claims out for payment and the “high-risk” claims out for denial, and will carefully examine the remaining claims;
  • They have approved up to 50,000 “low-risk” ERC claims submitted prior to September 14, 2023, and will commence sending out payments on these claims starting in September;
  • They have denied 28,000 “high-risk” claims representing over $5 billion in improper claims, but has confirmed that after receiving feedback from taxpayers and tax professionals approximately 10% of the denials issued were issued in error, but that the errors appear to be isolated instances; and
  • Some of the denial notices failed to inform taxpayers of their appeals rights (they can request an administrative appeal or appeal directly to the U.S. District Court). The IRS has confirmed that standard appeals rights apply to these denials.

The announcement does not indicate how many backlogged ERC claims the IRS still has to process.


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

IRS is processing more Employee Retention Credit claims

The IRS has announced that it will begin processing Employee Retention Credit (ERC) claims submitted prior to February 1, 2024. (IR-2024-203) Previously, the IRS had placed a moratorium on processing any claims submitted after September 13, 2023.

The IRS has also stated that:

  • They will prioritize moving the outstanding “low-risk” claims out for payment and the “high-risk” claims out for denial, and will carefully examine the remaining claims;
  • They have approved up to 50,000 “low-risk” ERC claims submitted prior to September 14, 2023, and will commence sending out payments on these claims starting in September;
  • They have denied 28,000 “high-risk” claims representing over $5 billion in improper claims, but has confirmed that after receiving feedback from taxpayers and tax professionals approximately 10% of the denials issued were issued in error, but that the errors appear to be isolated instances; and
  • Some of the denial notices failed to inform taxpayers of their appeals rights (they can request an administrative appeal or appeal directly to the U.S. District Court). The IRS has confirmed that standard appeals rights apply to these denials.

The announcement does not indicate how many backlogged ERC claims the IRS still has to process.


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

FTB creates dedicated e-mail address for San Diego County disaster notice assistance

The FTB has created an e-mail address exclusively for use by San Diego County taxpayers for account resolution related to disaster postponement. (FTB News Flash (August 8, 2024))

If San Diego County taxpayers received a penalty notice for the 2023 taxable year related to the disaster postponement, taxpayers or tax professionals can now submit an e-mail to:

FTBSanDiegoDisasterRelief@ftb.ca.gov

This e-mail address was designed exclusively for San Diego County taxpayers who received notices related to the disaster postponement. The following information is required to process the disaster relief request:

  • Taxpayer name;
  • Address during the disaster (must be principal residence or principal place of business);
  • E-mail address;
  • Telephone number; and
  • 10-digit FTB identification number or 15-digit notice number.

Taxpayers and tax professionals can also check MyFTB for information or they may call the FTB.

Last month, tax professionals were commenting that many of their San Diego County clients were receiving balance due/penalty due notices even though they qualified for the June 17 disaster-related postponement and filed and paid the tax due by June 17. Spidell brought this issue to the FTB’s attention and the FTB confirmed these notices were sent out erroneously. The FTB stated that due to system processing issues, these notices were generated prior to the payments being posted to taxpayer accounts.


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.FTB creates dedicated e-mail address for San Diego County disaster notice assistance

2024-37: FTB creates dedicated e-mail address for San Diego County disaster notice assistance

The FTB has created an e-mail address exclusively for use by San Diego County taxpayers for account resolution related to disaster postponement. (FTB News Flash (August 8, 2024))

If San Diego County taxpayers received a penalty notice for the 2023 taxable year related to the disaster postponement, taxpayers or tax professionals can now submit an e-mail to:

FTBSanDiegoDisasterRelief@ftb.ca.gov

This e-mail address was designed exclusively for San Diego County taxpayers who received notices related to the disaster postponement. The following information is required to process the disaster relief request:

  • Taxpayer name;
  • Address during the disaster (must be principal residence or principal place of business);
  • E-mail address;
  • Telephone number; and
  • 10-digit FTB identification number or 15-digit notice number.

Taxpayers and tax professionals can also check MyFTB for information or they may call the FTB.

Last month, tax professionals were commenting that many of their San Diego County clients were receiving balance due/penalty due notices even though they qualified for the June 17 disaster-related postponement and filed and paid the tax due by June 17. Spidell brought this issue to the FTB’s attention and the FTB confirmed these notices were sent out erroneously. The FTB stated that due to system processing issues, these notices were generated prior to the payments being posted to taxpayer accounts.


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Senate fails to pass Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act

Today the Senate failed to pass the American Families and Worker’s Act of 2024 (TRAFWA) by a vote of 48 to 44 (it required 60 votes to pass). This is the bill that was passed by the House in January 2024 on a vote of 357 to 70. At the time the bill passed the House, it had bi-partisan support, and commentators were expecting it to pass swiftly.

Had it passed, the bill would have, among other things:

  • Increased the Child Tax Credit;
  • Retroactively reinstated current expensing for domestic qualified research expenses, 100% bonus depreciation, and the larger business interest expense deduction;
  • Significantly increased Employee Retention Credit (ERC) penalties and retroactively imposed a January 31, 2024, cutoff date for new ERC claims; and
  • Provided additional disaster relief for those impacted by federally declared disasters occurring after 2019.

At this stage, it is highly unlikely that there will be any significant tax legislation passed until after the November 2024 election. However, we will keep you posted as any news develops.


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

2024-36: Senate fails to pass Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act

Today the Senate failed to pass the American Families and Worker’s Act of 2024 (TRAFWA) by a vote of 48 to 44 (it required 60 votes to pass). This is the bill that was passed by the House in January 2024 on a vote of 357 to 70. At the time the bill passed the House, it had bipartisan support, and commentators were expecting it to pass swiftly.

Had it passed, the bill would have, among other things:

  • Increased the Child Tax Credit;
  • Retroactively reinstated current expensing for domestic qualified research expenses, 100% bonus depreciation, and the larger business interest expense deduction;
  • Significantly increased Employee Retention Credit (ERC) penalties and retroactively imposed a January 31, 2024, cutoff date for new ERC claims; and
  • Provided additional disaster relief for those impacted by federally declared disasters occurring after 2019.

At this stage, it is highly unlikely that there will be any significant tax legislation passed until after the November 2024 election. However, we will keep you posted as any news develops.


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

2024-35: Applying estimated tax payments to passthrough entity elective tax

Recently we’ve heard from tax professionals with clients who mistakenly made an estimated tax payment on behalf of the entity rather than a passthrough entity elective tax payment — the question is whether these payments can be reapplied. Some FTB Tax Practitioner Hotline staff have been informing taxpayers and tax professionals that they can simply apply the estimated tax payments to the passthrough entity elective tax payment when they file the return.

We reached out to the FTB for clarification because they had previously informed us that this was not allowed. According to the FTB’s previous position, the passthrough entity elective tax payment would only be recognized if paid with Form 3893, via Web Pay as a passthrough entity elective tax payment, or by electronic funds withdrawal when using tax software.

We are pleased to report that the FTB is now allowing taxpayers to move these payments, and they stated:

“[W]hen the business representative inadvertently directs the application of a payment to be applied as an estimate payment, FTB can accommodate a request to correct the error in order to apply the payment as intended.

Any request should be submitted in writing and must include the business representative’s acknowledgment that reapplying the erroneous estimate payment to another liability may result in penalties and interest in the tax year where the payment was originally applied.

These requests can be submitted securely through a MyFTB account. Tax professionals may also contact the Tax Practitioner Hotline and speak with a representative to adjust the payment. A written request will still be required.”

The FTB recommends that the written request to reapply the estimated tax payment be done prior to the entity filing its return. The FTB will instruct Tax Practitioner Hotline staff accordingly.

This process is only available if the entity made the estimated tax payment. An individual owner’s estimated tax payment cannot be applied to the passthrough entity elective tax because that involves two different taxpayers.


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Applying estimated tax payments to passthrough entity elective tax

Recently we’ve heard from tax professionals with clients who mistakenly made an estimated tax payment on behalf of the entity rather than a passthrough entity elective tax payment — the question is whether these payments can be reapplied. Some FTB Tax Practitioner Hotline staff have been informing taxpayers and tax professionals that they can simply apply the estimated tax payments to the passthrough entity elective tax payment when they file the return.

We reached out to the FTB for clarification because they had previously informed us that this was not allowed. According to the FTB’s previous position, the passthrough entity elective tax payment would only be recognized if paid with Form 3893, via Web Pay as a passthrough entity elective tax payment, or by electronic funds withdrawal when using tax software.

We are pleased to report that the FTB is now allowing taxpayers to move these payments, and they stated:

“[W]hen the business representative inadvertently directs the application of a payment to be applied as an estimate payment, FTB can accommodate a request to correct the error in order to apply the payment as intended.

Any request should be submitted in writing and must include the business representative’s acknowledgment that reapplying the erroneous estimate payment to another liability may result in penalties and interest in the tax year where the payment was originally applied.

These requests can be submitted securely through a MyFTB account. Tax professionals may also contact the Tax Practitioner Hotline and speak with a representative to adjust the payment. A written request will still be required.”

The FTB recommends that the written request to reapply the estimated tax payment be done prior to the entity filing its return. The FTB will instruct Tax Practitioner Hotline staff accordingly.

This process is only available if the entity made the estimated tax payment. An individual owner’s estimated tax payment cannot be applied to the passthrough entity elective tax because that involves two different taxpayers.


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

IRS finalizes inherited IRA and other RMD regulations

The IRS has issued final regulations updating the required minimum distribution (RMD) rules. (TD 10001; RIN 1545-BP82) The 260 pages of final regulations (including explanations) adopt most of the regulations as proposed in 2022, including the regulations that address the distribution rules for inherited IRAs.

The inherited IRA rules implementing changes made by the SECURE Act require designated beneficiaries to continue taking RMDs each year during their 10-year distribution period, ensuring that the entire account balance is distributed by the end of the 10-year period if:

  • The deceased account owner had reached their required beginning date for taking RMDs at the time of their death; and
  • The account beneficiaries are not one of the five types of eligible designated beneficiaries (surviving spouse, minor child, a person 10 years younger than the decedent, or a person who is disabled or chronically ill).

This rule applies to accounts inherited from decedents who passed away after 2019. However, the IRS provided transitional relief that postponed the RMD requirement prior to 2025. The final regulations make clear that that this transitional relief did not extend the 10-year deadline. This means, for example, that accounts inherited from a decedent who passed away in 2020 must be fully distributed prior to 2031.

We will be providing details on this new guidance in upcoming issues of Spidell’s Federal Taxletter® and our Tax Update Webinars.

The regulations are available at:

https://go.spidell.com/e/837113/2024-14542-pdf/5xtmmc/2133350314/h/uzzVuxE6slm-U8AHudxrPpbPfTXwrxHQB4o2Rctm90g


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

2024-34: IRS finalizes inherited IRA and other RMD regulations

The IRS has issued final regulations updating the required minimum distribution (RMD) rules. (TD 10001; RIN 1545-BP82) The 260 pages of final regulations (including explanations) adopt most of the regulations as proposed in 2022, including the regulations that address the distribution rules for inherited IRAs.

The inherited IRA rules implementing changes made by the SECURE Act require designated beneficiaries to continue taking RMDs each year during their 10-year distribution period, ensuring that the entire account balance is distributed by the end of the 10-year period if:

  • The deceased account owner had reached their required beginning date for taking RMDs at the time of their death; and
  • The account beneficiaries are not one of the five types of eligible designated beneficiaries (surviving spouse, minor child, a person 10 years younger than the decedent, or a person who is disabled or chronically ill).

This rule applies to accounts inherited from decedents who passed away after 2019. However, the IRS provided transitional relief that postponed the RMD requirement prior to 2025. The final regulations make clear that that this transitional relief did not extend the 10-year deadline. This means, for example, that accounts inherited from a decedent who passed away in 2020 must be fully distributed prior to 2031.

We will be providing details on this new guidance in upcoming issues of Spidell’s Federal Taxletter® and our Tax Update Webinars.

The regulations are available at:

https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2024-14542.pdf


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

FTB sending erroneous balance due/penalty notices to San Diego County taxpayers

Over the last week, we have been hearing from tax professionals that many of their San Diego County clients are receiving balance due/penalty due notices even though they qualified for the June 17 disaster-related postponement and filed and paid the tax due by June 17. Spidell brought this issue to the FTB’s attention and the FTB confirmed these notices were sent out erroneously. The FTB has stated that due to system processing issues, these notices were generated prior to the payments being posted to taxpayer accounts.

All payments have now been posted. Therefore, the FTB is advising taxpayers and tax professionals that they can sign in to their MyFTB accounts and verify that there is no balance due. For taxpayers who indicated on their returns that they were in the San Diego County disaster area, if no balance due is showing on the taxpayer’s account, then the taxpayer and their tax professional do not need to take any further action. However, taxpayers who did not indicate on their returns that they were located in the disaster area must still contact the FTB to have any penalties abated.

An FTB Tax News Flash on this issue is available at:

www.ftb.ca.gov/about-ftb/newsroom/news-releases/2024-18-erroneous-notice-of-tax-return-changes-for-tax-year-2023.html


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

2024-33: FTB sending erroneous balance due/penalty notices to San Diego County taxpayers

Over the last week, we have been hearing from tax professionals that many of their San Diego County clients are receiving balance due/penalty due notices even though they qualified for the June 17 disaster-related postponement and filed and paid the tax due by June 17. Spidell brought this issue to the FTB’s attention and the FTB confirmed these notices were sent out erroneously. The FTB has stated that due to system processing issues, these notices were generated prior to the payments being posted to taxpayer accounts.

All payments have now been posted. Therefore, the FTB is advising taxpayers and tax professionals that they can sign in to their MyFTB accounts and verify that there is no balance due. For taxpayers who indicated on their returns that they were in the San Diego County disaster area, if no balance due is showing on the taxpayer’s account, then the taxpayer and their tax professional do not need to take any further action. However, taxpayers who did not indicate on their returns that they were located in the disaster area must still contact the FTB to have any penalties abated.

An FTB Tax News Flash on this issue is available at:

www.ftb.ca.gov/about-ftb/newsroom/news-releases/2024-18-erroneous-notice-of-tax-return-changes-for-tax-year-2023.html


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

FinCEN addresses beneficial ownership reporting for dissolved entities

Updated FAQs released by FinCEN clarify that business entities that ceased to exist prior to January 1, 2024, are not required to file beneficial ownership information (BOI) reports with FinCEN.

The relief from filing for dissolved entities only applies to entities that entirely completed the process of formally and irrevocably dissolving prior to January 1, 2024. Businesses that are administratively dissolved or suspended (e.g., for failure to pay a filing fee or comply with certain jurisdictional requirements), generally do not cease to exist as a legal entity unless the dissolution or suspension becomes permanent. Until dissolution or suspension becomes permanent, these entities must file BOI reports to avoid potential penalties.

An entity created after December 31, 2023, must still file a BOI report even if it dissolved prior to January 1, 2025. These reports must be filed within 90 days of receiving actual or public notice of creation or registration if the entity was created in 2024.

An entity that files an initial BOI report and then ceases to exist is not required to file an additional report to notify FinCEN that the company is no longer in existence.

The updated FinCEN FAQs are available at:

www.fincen.gov/boi-faqs


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

2024-32: FinCEN addresses beneficial ownership reporting for dissolved entities

Updated FAQs released by FinCEN clarify that business entities that ceased to exist prior to January 1, 2024, are not required to file beneficial ownership information (BOI) reports with FinCEN.

The relief from filing for dissolved entities only applies to entities that entirely completed the process of formally and irrevocably dissolving prior to January 1, 2024. Businesses that are administratively dissolved or suspended (e.g., for failure to pay a filing fee or comply with certain jurisdictional requirements), generally do not cease to exist as a legal entity unless the dissolution or suspension becomes permanent. Until dissolution or suspension becomes permanent, these entities must file BOI reports to avoid potential penalties.

An entity created after December 31, 2023, must still file a BOI report even if it dissolved prior to January 1, 2025. These reports must be filed within 90 days of receiving actual or public notice of creation or registration if the entity was created in 2024.

An entity that files an initial BOI report and then ceases to exist is not required to file an additional report to notify FinCEN that the company is no longer in existence.

The updated FinCEN FAQs are available at:

www.fincen.gov/boi-faqs


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

2024-31: Latest budget deal contains some tax relief

In addition to the budget bills we covered in our June 14 Flash E-mail (see “California budget bills pass with major tax changes”), the California Legislature has sent SB 175 to Governor Newsom for his approval. If enacted, SB 175 would eliminate the 2025 and 2026 NOL suspension and the $5 million business credit limitations contained in SB 167 if in the tax year:

  • The California Department of Finance determines that there is sufficient money in the General Fund over the multiyear forecast to eliminate the limitation for that tax year; and
  • The annual Budget Act provides that the credit limitation will not apply during that tax year.

The bill would also allow a taxpayer to make an irrevocable election in a tax year in which the $5 million credit limitation applies to treat the suspended credit amounts as a refundable credit. The refundable credit would be claimed equally (20% per year) over a five-year period beginning with the third taxable year after the tax year the election is made.

The Governor is expected to sign this bill.

No extension of first-year exemption from $800 annual tax

In our June 14 Flash E-mail, we also stated that the budget bills would extend the exemption from the $800 annual tax for LLCs, LPs, and LLPs if they organize or register in 2024 during their first year of doing business in California. While AB 107 did allocate money to administer the exemption, the exemption itself was not extended. This means that, absent any additional legislation enacted this year, there is no exemption from the $800 annual tax for LLCs, LPs, and LLPs that organize or register with the California Secretary of State’s Office in 2024. The first-year exemption for corporations still remains in effect.

The text of SB 175 is available at:

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240SB175


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

Latest budget deal contains some tax relief

In addition to the budget bills we covered in our June 14 Flash E-mail (see “California budget bills pass with major tax changes”), the California Legislature has sent SB 175 to Governor Newsom for his approval. If enacted, SB 175 would eliminate the 2025 and 2026 NOL suspension and the $5 million business credit limitations contained in SB 167 if in the tax year:

  • The California Department of Finance determines that there is sufficient money in the General Fund over the multiyear forecast to eliminate the limitation for that tax year; and
  • The annual Budget Act provides that the credit limitation will not apply during that tax year.

The bill would also allow a taxpayer to make an irrevocable election in a tax year in which the $5 million credit limitation applies to treat the suspended credit amounts as a refundable credit. The refundable credit would be claimed equally (20% per year) over a five-year period beginning with the third taxable year after the tax year the election is made.

The Governor is expected to sign this bill.

No extension of first-year exemption from $800 annual tax

In our June 14 Flash E-mail, we also stated that the budget bills would extend the exemption from the $800 annual tax for LLCs, LPs, and LLPs if they organize or register in 2024 during their first year of doing business in California. While AB 107 did allocate money to administer the exemption, the exemption itself was not extended. This means that, absent any additional legislation enacted this year, there is no exemption from the $800 annual tax for LLCs, LPs, and LLPs that organize or register with the California Secretary of State’s Office in 2024. The first-year exemption for corporations still remains in effect.

The text of SB 175 is available at:

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240SB175


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

2024-30: Passthrough entity elective tax legislative fix still coming?

On Monday, July 1, 2024, the Assembly Revenue and Taxation Committee will hear SB 1501, the bill that would provide a fix for the current “all or nothing” June 15 passthrough entity elective tax prepayment requirement. Amendments to the bill since it was passed by the Senate are being proposed to:

  • Remove the proposed 5% penalty that would be imposed against passthrough entities that failed to timely make the required June 15 payment and replace it with a 10% reduction in the amount of credit that can be claimed by the participating passthrough entity owners; and
  • Allow taxpayers to still make the election whether the prepayment was not paid at all by June 15 or was underpaid by June 15 (the original version of SB 1501 only allowed those taxpayers who made no payment at all by June 15 to qualify for relief).

Even if passed by the Revenue and Taxation Committee, the bill would have to pass several more steps before it becomes law. If enacted, these changes would be effective beginning with the 2024 taxable year.

As we’ve previously reported, under current law, taxpayers wanting to make a passthrough entity tax election for the tax year must make a prepayment of the tax by June 15 of the tax year equal to the greater of:

  • $1,000; or
  • 50% of the passthrough entity tax due for the prior tax year.

The text of the current version of the bill is available at:

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240SB1501


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Passthrough entity elective tax legislative fix still coming?

On Monday, July 1, 2024, the Assembly Revenue and Taxation Committee will hear SB 1501, the bill that would provide a fix for the current “all or nothing” June 15 passthrough entity elective tax prepayment requirement. Amendments to the bill since it was passed by the Senate are being proposed to:

  • Remove the proposed 5% penalty that would be imposed against passthrough entities that failed to timely make the required June 15 payment and replace it with a 10% reduction in the amount of credit that can be claimed by the participating passthrough entity owners; and
  • Allow taxpayers to still make the election whether the prepayment was not paid at all by June 15 or was underpaid by June 15 (the original version of SB 1501 only allowed those taxpayers who made no payment at all by June 15 to qualify for relief).

Even if passed by the Revenue and Taxation Committee, the bill would have to pass several more steps before it becomes law. If enacted, these changes would be effective beginning with the 2024 taxable year.

As we’ve previously reported, under current law, taxpayers wanting to make a passthrough entity tax election for the tax year must make a prepayment of the tax by June 15 of the tax year equal to the greater of:

  • $1,000; or
  • 50% of the passthrough entity tax due for the prior tax year.

The text of the current version of the bill is available at:

https://go.spidell.com/e/837113/-xhtml-bill-id-202320240SB1501/5xn9l1/2100148716/h/Xp0sUVWmTEqyaI91C55nOdy_VcL1dzq7pGDRU0SqcO0


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

2024-29: LLC fee class action litigation update

As we previously reported, a California superior court has certified a class action suit that will provide relief to out-of-state LLCs, LPs, and corporations that were passive investors in an LLC doing business in California (see “Class action suit certified on behalf of out-of-state passive LLC investors” in the March 2024 issue of Spidell’s California Taxletter®).

The FTB has begun sending notices out to potential class members informing them that they will be part of the class unless they opt out by August 20, 2024. The notice is available on the FTB’s website at:

www.ftb.ca.gov/tax-pros/law/Bahl-Media-vs-FTB-Minimum-Tax-GateMarks-Duplex.pdf

Prior to the OTA’s precedential decision in Appeal of Jali (2019-OTA-204P), the FTB was erroneously imposing the $800 annual/minimum tax and penalties and interest against many of these taxpayers even though these entities were not considered to be “doing business” in California and were not subject to the tax.

It’s important to note that the class certified by the court only includes taxpayers that paid the tax and filed timely claims for refund. This is true even though in FTB Notice 2017-01 FTB told taxpayers that they were ineligible for refunds if they had more than a 0.2% interest in the LLC doing business in California.

The attorneys representing taxpayers in the class action suit, Amy Silverstein of Silverstein & Pomerants, LLP, and Alexandar Freeman of Calvo Fisher & Jabos, are encouraging any other taxpayers negatively impacted by the FTB’s treatment of passive activities as “doing business” to contact them. This may include taxpayers that paid the tax for any year but did not file a claim for refund, and taxpayers that did not pay the tax and have received notices from the FTB stating they owe the tax.

They can be reached at asilverstein@sptaxlaw.com and afreeman@calvojacob.com.


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

LLC fee class action litigation update

As we previously reported, a California superior court has certified a class action suit that will provide relief to out-of-state LLCs, LPs, and corporations that were passive investors in an LLC doing business in California (see “Class action suit certified on behalf of out-of-state passive LLC investors” in the March 2024 issue of Spidell’s California Taxletter®).

The FTB has begun sending notices out to potential class members informing them that they will be part of the class unless they opt out by August 20, 2024. The notice is available on the FTB’s website at:

www.ftb.ca.gov/tax-pros/law/Bahl-Media-vs-FTB-Minimum-Tax-GateMarks-Duplex.pdf

Prior to the OTA’s precedential decision in Appeal of Jali (2019-OTA-204P), the FTB was erroneously imposing the $800 annual/minimum tax and penalties and interest against many of these taxpayers even though these entities were not considered to be “doing business” in California and were not subject to the tax.

It’s important to note that the class certified by the court only includes taxpayers that paid the tax and filed timely claims for refund. This is true even though in FTB Notice 2017-01 FTB told taxpayers that they were ineligible for refunds if they had more than a 0.2% interest in the LLC doing business in California.

The attorneys representing taxpayers in the class action suit, Amy Silverstein of Silverstein & Pomerants, LLP, and Alexandar Freeman of Calvo Fisher & Jabos, are encouraging any other taxpayers negatively impacted by the FTB’s treatment of passive activities as “doing business” to contact them. This may include taxpayers that paid the tax for any year but did not file a claim for refund, and taxpayers that did not pay the tax and have received notices from the FTB stating they owe the tax.

They can be reached at asilverstein@sptaxlaw.com and afreeman@calvojacob.com.


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and see why more than 18,000 tax pros choose Spidell each year. Click here for details.

Fraud Friday: Garbage to gold

Lucent Polymers, Inc. discovered a way to turn “garbage to gold” by using recycled and scrap materials to create high-quality plastics that were flame-resistant and extremely strong. Unfortunately, the business model was a total sham. The flame-resistant products routinely caught fire and impact-resistant materials were too brittle and shattered. But the company’s founders hid this from potential buyers by providing them with falsified lab tests that shows the products performed as claimed. After the company sold twice in quick succession, the SEC caught wind and the founders have been convicted of securities fraud and money laundering.

(https://resource-recycling.com/plastics/2021/03/31/lucent-execs-sentenced-for-federal-crimes/)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Fancy colored diamonds

The founder of Argyle Coin, a virtual currency that was allegedly backed by “fancy colored diamonds” received a seven-year sentence and will pay $23 million in restitution for defrauding investors. Argyle Coin, LLC was created when the founder’s prior diamond-selling scam had started to unravel, and he used money from investors in his new “high return, no risk” digital currency to pay off existing investors. He also managed to siphon away $10 million for himself to spend on a house, shopping at Gucci, purchasing horses, and riding lessons for his adult son.

(https://coingeek.com/argyle-coin-founder-involved-in-25m-scam-gets-7-years-in-jail/)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: 300 B.C.

One of the earliest recorded instances of fraud took place in 300 B.C. Two Greek merchants, Hegestratos and Zenosthemis, took out an insurance policy and borrowed money on a cargo ship that was allegedly going to be filled with corn, but their plan was to sink the boat, keep the money, and sell the corn elsewhere. As Hegestratos was attempting to chop a hole in the hull of the boat with an axe, one of the crew members discovered him. Hegestratos attempted to escape by jumping off the boat and trying to swim to shore, but he drown at sea; Zenosthemis was tried in an Athenian court.

(www.investopedia.com/articles/financial-theory/09/history-of-fraud.asp)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Celebrity attorney Michael Avenatti

Celebrity attorney Michael Avenatti was sentenced to 168 months in prison for wire fraud and endeavoring to obstruct the administration of the Internal Revenue Code. He was also ordered to pay $10 million in restitution to four clients and the IRS. Avenatti received funds for his clients and placed them into client trust accounts, but then misappropriated the funds to finance an extravagant lifestyle. He then lied to clients about the terms of their settlement or whether he had received their funds. In one case, Avenatti drained a client’s trust account to fund his own coffee business; in another case, he used the bulk of a client’s settlement to purchase a private jet. Regarding the obstruction charge, Avenatti lied to IRS agents, and changed his company’s name, EIN, and bank information to avoid IRS levies.

(www.justice.gov/usao-cdca/pr/lawyer-michael-avenatti-sentenced-14-years-federal-prison-stealing-millions-dollars)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: CAR-HIT-U

A Detroit-area personal injury attorney known for his 855-CAR-HIT-U billboards has been convicted for tax fraud for failing to report over $2.6 million in income. He concealed the funds by placing them in undisclosed Interest on Lawyer’s Trust Accounts, which are used to hold funds on behalf of clients. He failed to disclose these accounts to the Michigan State Bar Foundation and his tax return preparer. He’s facing prison time plus penalties for each count.

(www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/michigan/2022/11/19/metro-detroit-personal-injury-attorney-convicted-of-tax-fraud/69662737007/)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Tax (fraud) preparation manual

A Texas tax preparer and his two children were convicted for defrauding the U.S. after filing false tax returns to inflate their clients’ refunds. They fabricated clients’ Schedule A, itemized deductions, and Schedule C, sole proprietorship profit and loss statements, claiming the taxpayer owned a business when no such business existed, claiming unreimbursed employee expenses such as travel and per diem, and claiming business expenses that were never incurred. The company also had a “tax preparation manual,” which was a handbook that outlined exactly how to commit fraud. The manual advised tax preparers to manipulate income to maximize refunds rather than referring to the law to determine whether an activity was a business for income tax purposes and whether expenses properly qualified as a business deduction.

(www.justice.gov/usao-ndtx/pr/san-angelo-tax-preparer-sentenced-14-years-tax-fraud)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: 13,000 lottery “wins”

A man who has “won” the Massachusetts lottery in excess of 13,000 times has pleaded guilty to charges of tax fraud conspiracy, money laundering conspiracy, and filing false tax returns. The man and family members operated a lottery ticket cashing scheme that brought in $21 million between 2011 and 2019. In Massachusetts, money owed in federal taxes or child support can be deducted from lottery wins over $600. To avoid this deduction, winners often use underground ticket cashing businesses, which take a cut of the winnings. The family members reported fraudulent gambling losses and understated their income, resulting in large refunds. 

(www.casino.org/news/mass-lottery-frequent-winner-pleads-guilty-to-tax-fraud-conspiracy/)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: The Nigerian Prince e-mail scam

The Nigerian Prince e-mail scam is a modern interpretation of the Spanish Prisoner scam that dates back to the late 18th century. Originally, businessmen were contacted by an individual allegedly trying to smuggle someone connected to a wealthy family out of a prison in Spain. The scammer promised to share money with the victim in exchange for a small amount of money up front to bribe prison guards. The scam has persisted, shifting to requests for assistance purportedly coming from a Nigerian prince. While Nigeria is most often the nation referred to in these scams, they originate in other nations as well. The scam is also known as the “419 scam”; 419 refers to the article of the Nigerian Criminal Code dealing with fraud (in Chapter 38: “Obtaining property by false pretenses; Cheating”).

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advance-fee_scam)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Rap duo

Two female Detroit rappers (known on stage as Deuces Wild) are charged with identity theft and conspiracy for a scheme going back to 2013 that involved filing fraudulent estate and trust tax returns claiming $13.6 million, of which they had already received more than $5 million. The duo filed 122 returns, opened 29 bank accounts, and roped friends and acquaintances into the scheme by promising them a cut of the money in exchange for receiving checks. One of the women used stolen identification to open accounts, rent apartments, open a UPS Box, and purchase expensive items, including jewelry and watches. Both women are facing ten years in prison if convicted.

(www.fox2detroit.com/news/metro-detroit-rappers-charged-with-stealing-over-5-million-from-irs)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Julia Butterfly

“Tax redirection” is a form of tax rebellion where the individual pays their tax directly to another source rather than the IRS as a form of protest. Julia “Butterfly” Hill, an environmentalist turned proponent of tax redirection, sent about $150,000 in federal taxes directly to schools, arts and culture programs, community gardens, and other recipients, stating in a letter to the IRS, “I’m not refusing to pay my taxes. I’m actually paying them but I’m paying them where they belong because you refuse to do so.” Hill is best known for her tree sit in the late 1990s, when she lived in a 180-foot tall Redwood tree named Luna for 738 days to protect it from being cut down by the Pacific Lumber Company.

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julia_Butterfly_Hill)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: The Whiskey Rebellion

In 1791, Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton proposed the first U.S. tax, an excise on distilled spirits, to pay down the debt incurred from the American Revolution. Large whiskey producers paid the tax annually at a rate of six cents per gallon, with further tax breaks the more they produced. But small producers were charged nine cents per gallon in taxes. Farmers in western Pennsylvania who used whiskey for trade objected to the tax and protested by tarring and feathering the tax collectors. The rebellion lasted from 1791 to 1794, ending with a confrontation that caused President George Washington to send 13,000 troops to contain what some feared would become another revolution. (www.history.com/topics/early-us/whiskey-rebellion)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: “Illegal tax protestors”

Tax protestors rely on various arguments, such as the Sixteenth Amendment not being properly ratified, income is not defined in the Internal Revenue Code or the Constitution, or that the Internal Revenue Code actually doesn’t require anyone to pay tax. Prior to 1998, the IRS would label such individuals as “illegal tax protestors” in their system to flag them for enforcement actions and alert IRS employees to be cautious in dealing with them. But in 1998, Congress passed the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 (P.L. 105-206) prohibiting the IRS from continuing this practice because it stigmatized these individuals and biased IRS employees against them, even if they had ultimately paid their tax.

(www.washingtonpost.com/news/federal-eye/wp/2014/09/11/what-is-an-illegal-tax-protester-and-why-cant-the-irs-use-that-term-any-more/)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: In the doghouse

A Minnesota dog breeder is in the doghouse after an investigation discovered that they were reporting income on their tax returns from fewer sales of puppies than they actually made in the years at issue. The Facebook page for BrookeMarie’s Goldendoodle Love clearly showed the number of litters and how many total puppies were for sale, which did not match up with the amounts reported. The puppies were going for between $2,500 and $3,500 each, plus there should have been charged 7% Minnesota sales tax, which the breeder also failed to pay. The owner has been charged with three felony counts of filing fraudulent income and sales tax returns and failing to pay or collect income and sales tax.

(www.southernminnesotanews.com/dog-breeder-accused-of-tax-fraud/)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: $62 million in Paycheck Protection Program fraud

A California tax preparer was sentenced to ten years in prison for orchestrating a scheme that defrauded the Paycheck Protection Program out of $62 million. At the time he engaged in the fraud, he was on supervised release for a previous fraud scheme in which he filed false income tax returns on behalf of more than nine professional athletes. In the PPP scam, he filed false applications for PPP loans on behalf of small businesses and shell companies in exchange for 30% of the loan proceeds. He also filed fraudulent supporting tax returns that the small business owners never saw or approved. To hide the funds he received from the scam, he asked the businesses to pay the fee with cashier’s checks and to write “payroll” in the memo line.

(www.wric.com/news/crime/man-sentenced-for-tax-fraud-schemes-resulting-in-more-than-62-million-loss-for-us-government/)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Distributing false resale certificates

Sotheby’s auction house is under investigation in New York for allegedly distributing false resale certificates to around a dozen clients, allowing them to pose as art dealers and avoid paying tax on revenue from their sales. The scheme is related to a lawsuit in which a Sotheby’s client purchased $27 million in art for his personal collection in transactions that avoided tax. Initially, it seemed this was an isolated incident, but further investigation revealed multiple fraudulent resale certificates, indicating that staff at Sotheby’s had “willfully turned a blind eye to the fraudulent distribution of resale certificates.” Sotheby’s argues it shouldn’t be held responsible for the actions of low-level employees. (www.artnews.com/art-news/news/sothebys-tax-fraud-investigation-expands-1234637480/)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: AI pool-finding

France is using AI to find undeclared swimming pools, which so far has generated 10 million in tax. In France, a swimming pool can affect tax because housing taxes are calculated based on a property’s rental value. Since the beginning of the pandemic, and with recent heat waves affecting Europe, the number of pools in France has greatly increased. The AI pool-finding project so far has only covered nine of France’s 96 metropolitan areas, but it has already discovered 20,356 undeclared swimming pools. The French tax office DGFiP (a.k.a., Le Fisc) estimates it can bring in an additional €40 million in tax once it’s finished using AI to analyze the rest of metropolitan France. (www.theverge.com/2022/8/30/23328442/france-ai-swimming-pool-tax-aerial-photos)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Romanian taxes on imported diesel fuel

The U.S. will return $1.2 million in forfeited funds to Romania, stemming from a tax fraud scheme involving diesel fuel. A Romanian couple avoided Romanian taxes on imported diesel fuel by claiming the fuel was a lower grade of industrial and maritime fuel. The untaxed income from the sale of the higher value diesel was laundered through a number of bank accounts and shell companies controlled by the couple, and resulted in an overall $58.677 million tax loss to Romania. Before they could be arrested, the couple fled to Washington state, but eventually were extradited, leaving behind a large piece of property and assets that were sold. The funds from the sale will be returned to the government of Romania. 

(www.justice.gov/opa/pr/12-million-be-returned-romanian-government-victim-international-tax-fraud-and-money, www.justice.gov/opa/pr/12-million-be-returned-romanian-government-victim-international-tax-fraud-and-money)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Paid public restrooms

A German woman who owns a cleaning company that earns revenue from paid public restrooms is on trial for failing to report around €1.2 million. The restrooms have voluntary contribution plates where visitors can leave change, which generated the income that she failed to report. But the case is complicated in that some of the charges date back more than 14 years, the German statute of limitations for tax fraud. Also, some of the restrooms were near the Austrian border and present a jurisdictional problem. And because income from the restrooms is based on voluntary donations, it’s difficult to nail down an exact amount of revenue; even the judge in the case suggested that an amount of €600,000 may be more appropriate than €1.2 million. 

(www.taxbuzz.com/blog/germany-toilet-tax-evasion-trial-begins)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Yoga studio stacking parties

Owners of a NYC yoga studio are facing 30 years in prison for conspiracy and tax evasion for failing to file returns while the yoga studio raked in millions. The chain of studios closed in 2020 following allegations of questionable business practices such as pressuring instructors to work for free. Yoga session fees were donation-based and collected in tissue boxes that were passed around, but instructors were not allowed to count the money collected. Instead, the cash was brought to one studio owner’s home for “stacking parties” where the bills were counted and stacked. The owners spent the funds on personal items such as $270,000 on airfare, $76,000 on hotels, $40,000 on Denver Broncos season tickets, $39,000 at restaurants, and more than $60,000 spent at country clubs and on event tickets. 

(www.nytimes.com/2022/08/24/nyregion/tax-fraud-yoga-to-the-people.html)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Imprecise IQ scores

A Court of Appeals upheld a ruling against a taxpayer for filing false tax returns connected to his wife’s embezzlement of millions of dollars from her employer. The taxpayer argued he thought the funds were his wife’s gambling winnings, which he used to buy a yacht, a snowmobile, and other luxury items. At the appeal trial, the taxpayer argued the district court erred in not allowing evidence of his cognitive deficiencies, consisting of expert testimony and his high school transcript that contained numerous “E” grades. However, the expert could not rule out that the taxpayer’s performance during his cognitive exam was the result of malingering, and the high school transcript contained “an unexplained grading system and imprecise IQ scores.” Based on these and the taxpayer’s own testimony, the court agreed he was aware the couple was spending more than they reported and was found to have not disclosed all income to his accountants. (U.S. v. Mills (July 22, 2022) U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, Case No. 21-2423)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: 76 fraudulent charities

The House Ways and Means Oversight Subcommittee has contacted the IRS looking for answers regarding the streamlined process for applications for tax-exempt status, which allowed one fraudster to have 76 fraudulent charities approved. The fake nonprofits all had names that sounded similar to legitimate nonprofits, such as “American Cancer Society of Michigan.” The actual American Cancer Society had even gotten wind of its fraudulent namesake and contacted the IRS. The IRS is now under fire for not noticing that this particular group of fraudulent charities all used the same Staten Island address. It also highlights the IRS’s own statistics that only one in 2,400 of these streamlined applications gets denied. (www.wealthmanagement.com/philanthropy/irs-hot-water-over-fraudulent-charities)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: A vexatious litigant

After being disbarred for bringing numerous unmeritorious litigations and being declared a vexatious litigant (one trial judge wrote in a statement of decision that the taxpayer is “a relentless bully” who displays “terrifying arrogance”), a former attorney found himself in Tax Court regarding disallowed Schedule C expenses. The claimed Schedule C business activities did not generate a profit and mostly stemmed from litigation relating to challenging the taxpayer’s disbarment and lawsuits that would otherwise personally benefit him. He deducted court filing fees, life insurance policy expenses, and various utility expenses, none of which were allowable expenses because the taxpayer failed to show that he engaged in any business activities for the year at issue. (Kinney v. Comm., TCM 2022-81)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: A sovereign citizen

A Michigan man is facing felony charges and prison time for bouncing three checks he wrote to pay his taxes. The man, who also claims to be a sovereign citizen, sent the State of Michigan three checks for $1 million each, which bounced because they had routing numbers for TCF Bank. That in and of itself is not a crime, except he did not actually have an account at TCF Bank. Under Michigan law, no-account checks/writing checks on closed account is a class H felony that carries up to 2 years in prison. (www.michigan.gov/ag/news/press-releases/2022/02/10/self-proclaimed-sovereign-citizen-charged-with-writing-fake-checks)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Shakira, Shakira

After being accused by the Spanish government of failing to pay €14 million in tax on income earned between 2012 and 2014, pop star Shakira has rejected a plea deal with Spanish authorities and is moving forward with a trial that she says will prove she has already paid the tax in question and owes no tax debt. For the tax years at issue, Shakira’s official residence was the Bahamas, but she also lived with footballer Gerard Pique in Barcelona. If found guilty, she could face fines and a prison term. (www.euronews.com/2022/07/27/shakira-opts-to-go-to-trial-in-spain-over-alleged-145m-tax-fraud)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Nine professional athletes

A Los Angeles tax preparer has pleaded guilty to engaging in two separate fraud schemes. The first involved filing fraudulent income tax returns for at least nine professional athletes, reporting fabricated business and personal losses. The tax pro and his associates claimed they had specialized knowledge that the athletes’ prior tax professionals lacked and convinced the athletes to amend past returns to generate large fraudulent refunds. They then charged the athletes a fee of 30% of the resulting refund and directed the athletes to send the fee to shell entities. Second, the tax pro and his associates applied for PPP loans on behalf of a number of small businesses, shell entities with few or no employees that they controlled, and business entities controlled by others. They inflated the number of employees and monthly payroll costs claimed on the PPP loan applications and submitted fabricated tax returns in support of the applications. Some of the business owners never saw their loan applications before they were filed. The tax pro charged a fee of 30% of the loan amounts. He’s facing up to 25 years in prison. (https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/second-defendant-pleads-guilty-multimillion-dollar-tax-fraud-scheme-involving-professional)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Capital with a K

A North Carolina tax preparation business owner has been sentenced to almost four years in prison for a tax fraud scheme that involved hundreds of tax returns and that netted him $700,000. Kapital Financial Services had two locations in Charlotte, and the business owner directed employees to falsify clients’ tax returns, including claiming false deductions, business losses, American Opportunity credits, education credits and earned income tax credits. He also trained his employees on how to create the fraudulent returns to avoid IRS detection and provided them with scripts and cheat sheets. Employees were not allowed to provide clients with copies of their returns, they were only allowed to give clients their refund amount because the fees Kapital charged were taken from the inflated refunds. (https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/charlotte-tax-preparer-sentenced-prison)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: $1 billion in crypto scams

Crypto scams have reached the $1 billion mark for the period between January 2021 and March 2022. Almost 40% of the scams originated on social media. In terms of type of fraud, most scams relate to fake investments that promise large returns, with second place going to “romance scams” that involve gaining trust using a fake online identity and then manipulating funds out of the victim. Most of the scams involve Bitcoin (70%), followed by tether (10%) and Ethereum (9%). (www.forbes.com/sites/rosemariemiller/2022/06/06/bitcoin-leads-crypto-fraud-as-ftc-confirms-1-billion-milestone)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: A seized show jumping horse

After busting a tax shelter promoter, the U.S. government seized many of the assets he purchased with the proceeds, including a $750,000 show jumping horse. However, after realizing that it was going to cost at least $50,000 to feed and care for the horse, the government agreed to sell the horse back to the tax shelter promoter’s daughter for $25,000. The daughter had been planning to ride the horse down the aisle on her wedding day. The government has seized horses before; in 2012 they sold 150 horses for $4.8 million, which were seized from a comptroller who had been misappropriating city funds. But maintaining assets before they’re sold can be expensive, as the government has found regarding the maintenance of superyachts seized from Russian oligarchs. (https://finance.yahoo.com/news/horse-seized-tax-fraud-case-133413396.html)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Counterfeit chocolate

A bust of U.S.-themed candy stores on Oxford Street in London raked in £22,000 worth of counterfeit Wonka bars and over £100,000 of counterfeit goods such as vapes, Apple and Samsung products, hookah products, and watches. All counterfeit vapes recovered contained excessive levels of nicotine and had not been approved by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency. The Food Standard Agency also warned anyone who purchased the counterfeit Wonka bars not to eat them, as there is no way of knowing what ingredients were used or whether food hygiene practices were followed. The stores are being investigated for millions of pounds in tax evasion as well.

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: That’s a lot of Happy Meals

McDonald’s France has agreed to pay a total of €1.25 billion in fines, penalties, and back taxes to settle a tax evasion case after years of negotiations.  McDonalds France was accused of hiding French profits in lower-tax Luxembourg from 2009 through 2020, and reporting lower profits in France. An investigation was started in 2016 after union officials reported the company for tax evasion. The settlement is made up of a €508 million fine and €737 million in back taxes and is the second-biggest tax settlement in French history. (The largest was the €2.1 billion fine paid by aircraft builder Airbus in 2020.) (https://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/mcdonalds-pay-france-13-billion-tax-fraud-case-85434599)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.