Can we talk frankly about “business” autos? I can’t be the only tax professional who cringes every time a client says they bought a new car for their business that they insist is only used for business purposes.
In the most recent instance in my own practice, a lawyer told me that he bought a new Mercedes G550 in 2024 – a vehicle with a $150,000 price tag. He said he chose the G class because it has a gross vehicle weight rating over 6,000 lbs., therefore he can claim 60% bonus depreciation for the vehicle ($150,000 x 60% = $90,000 expected deduction).
When I informed my client that 60% bonus depreciation is only available for vehicles that have 100% business use, he insisted that he only used the car to commute to and from the office, therefore, the vehicle is 100% business. When I informed him that commuting to and from work is a personal expense and not a business expense, I got the usual “what do you mean commuting to and from work isn’t a business expense?” I’ve only explained this issue to clients a bajillion times.
I know my client’s business and I knew right away that his business mileage, if any, was probably 5% at best. Of course, he also had the firm purchase the vehicle. So now I have to deal with a vehicle owned by the business with 5% business mileage (if I’m lucky) and I’m sure the firm’s credit card will include car payments, gas, maintenance, etc.
This is only one of many, many different variations of business auto issues I encounter on a regular basis that have caused me to pull all my hair out (there’s none left). Do you hate business autos as much as I do? What business auto issues make you want to smash glass? Let me know via e-mail at mikeg@spidell.com.